CPS, internet safety, Media, Uncategorized

The Daily Haze attacked with false claim!

UPDATE:

24 hours after releasing this article, Meko Haze recieved a letter to cease. Below are the images.

A very disturbing trend floating around activists who deal with children, is the pedo claim. If you disagree, correct, or simply meet the wrong person, you may get accused. Doing what we do, it shouldn’t be a surprise that a claim would be made against a journalist. Thankfully, this time it wasn’t anybody associated with our platform.

Background

The Daily Haze, in the past, has always proven itself to be a reliable and trustworthy media source. In the past, we have shared many of their articles. In fact, we have even gone as far as to write a few some years back.

Although, until now, we have never addressed any claim made against its founder, Meko Haze, this one we felt compelled to. The accusation, quoted by “The Daily Haze,” is shown below. The accuser, Amelia Duran.

The accusation is fairly blunt. The claim is that Meko believes that pedophilia doesn’t harm children. The way it is worded almost makes it sound as if he is content with the act. There is just two issues here:

1. We have had many discussions with Meko, over the years. At no point had he ever given us this impression.

2. Her unwillingness to display any form of evidence. In fact, she outright states that she won’t. Why is that?

I had intended to question her about the claim, ask for the evidence myself. However, according to Meko, she had blocked him. Being that I knew for a fact that they were friends, I checked. Sure enough, he was no longer on her friends-list. This sudden block confirmed exqctly what we thought:

1. She made a false accusation, and got caught.

2. When confronted with actual facts, she eliminated the source. This tactic is to prevent other people from seeing the confrontation; people do this so to not tarnish their lie.

We looked into Amelia, following this claim. According to an anonymous source and friend, she is proned to alcoholism. Furthermore, she is pro ed to making posts such as this, accusing people of various things. Even if she isn’t an alcoholic and our source is wrong, she still tried to make a devestating claim against a respected journalist.

We have advocated before against false alegations. The damage they cause is often unrepairable. Although a few people will always take a person’s word for gold, we choose to stand with Meko and his platform, “The Daily Haze.“

Uncategorized

Trucking for free

The trucking industry, by no means, is an easy job. The drivers have to deal with lumpers, shippers, road hazards, and their respective companies. With all of this, you would expect these men/women to be treated with dignity and respect. However, that is not the case. The reality is, drivers are often underpaid, if they get paid at all, abused, and treated like scum. With that, and the help of a truck driver, we are exposing one of the biggest corruption outside the government.

The driver, who wishes to remain anonymous out of fear of retaliation, has given us much to compose this article with. As a driver, he is classified as an owner operator, leasing to buy a semi. It is his story that we have chosen to cover.

Provided by this driver, we see he actually made a good paycheck for just one week of work. $633.96 is something most of us would kill for. Upon initially looking at this, we had to ask the question, “what’s the problem”? Afterall, that is good pay. A short time later, we were shown the problem.

While he made over $600, mysteriously enough, he never actually made that. In no other industry have we seen a check variation like this. According to the driver, he had outstanding balances, but these aren’t reflected on his checkstub. Why is that?

So, doing what we do, we asked questions: Where did his money go? How deeply corrupted is this industry? Let’s start with this driver’s intel.

PAID SLAVERY?

From what we are told, most of the actual work conducted by truck drivers goes unpaid. While every other industry is required to pay for services rendered, apparently this industry is exempt. Unpaid work, according to our source, goes as follows:

  1. Pre-trip inspections
  2. Post-trip inspections
  3. DOT side of road inspections
  4. Checking in/out of shippers and recievers.
  5. Lost hours from extensive dock times.
  6. Only paid zipcode to zipcode, not paid for in city driving.

And the list goes on. Apparently, the trucking industry is exempt from many of the labor laws that are mandated in other fields of work. To make matters worst, these people have nobody to turn to for help.

UNFAIR TREATMENT

Another aspect that was brought to our attention, is the unfair treatment to drivers. RTI, Celedon, Knight, and many other companies, have policies that dilebritly target drivers.

We asked for an example of such unfair treatment; he was quick to reply. Recently he had ran out of hours given to him for driving. The reason was the reciever taking to long. Now, to backtrack just a bit. Early this year, DOT passed a federal law allowing drivers to drive to a location with parking, even if their clock has run out.

This driver utilized this new law and immediately was written up. The company placed blame on him claiming he should had made them work faster. If you are scratching your heads, at this point, so are we. Regardless, this is their logic, he claims. We asked for documentation, which he provided. However, we cannot provide that here since it has personal information contained within it.

We may do a series on this, as it is almost never covered. Our job, as a media, is to give a voice to those who feel they don’t have one; it is our hope we are giving this individual his voice to be heard.

Uncategorized

Sorry: 501c3 not found.

DISCLAIMER:

We have been hearing a lot of interesting things about a Francesca Amato. Now, before we really dig into this, I must say that nobody with WoC has ever heard of this woman prior to this article. All information provided is purely based on our observations, findings, and creditable source information. All source information was given anonymously. Their names will not be provided in this article, in email, or private messaging.

OBJECTIVE I

When we began this article, we were actually looking into P4P’s North Carolina chapter leader, Danielle Hatcher. We had heard rumors of corruption within the “501c3” and decided it was something worth looking into. Upon looking into Hatcher, we had stumbled across an image posted to Social Media. That image is below.

We found this to be rather interesting. Although we don’t know why she is currently in jail, a disturbing rumor has circulated regarding the advocate. The rumor states as follows:

At some point, while in jail, Ms. Hatcher took it upon herself to use feces as a method for “finger painting.”

As we stated, this is a rumor and is currently not proven. However, it was this rumor that lead us to look a little bit deeper. What is this organization that she helps manage?

OBJECTIVE II

We did a 501c3 check on P4P. The reason for this was because, according to the organization’s website, they had a 501c3 status. Well, we looked and we found nothing called, “Punished for Protecting,” “Punished for Parenting,” “Punished 4 Protecting,” or “Punished for Parenting.” To put this blatently, as far as we can tell, this 501c3 does not exist; but don’t they claim to be one?

Yes, yes they do.

We gave them a benefit of a doubt. Maybe they meant charity rather than 501c3. We conducted an identical search with the same results.

So if they aren’t found on New York’s list of charities or 501c3 organizations, what exactly are they? Well, I don’t think we need to state it but we know you can compose the conclusion. Since we couldn’t find it on any list, we decided to look into the founder.

OBJECTIVE III

Francesca Amato is the woman behind this “organization.” According to a Facebook page (depicted below,) she is running for NY governor. Well, we already found one issue, so we looked into that as well. What we found was equally as disturbing as the previous findings; there were no obtainable records that she is, or has, ever ran for a political position…and yet she makes the claim.

To be a politician, that means you have to actually be running, or are currently in office. When we checked into this, as previously mentioned, there were no obtainable records. The reason these records are unobtainable is purely because they do not exist.

But, as we also stated, she claims to be actively running. Now, we could point out other problems on this page, such as her using a gmail account rather than an actual account linked to her “political” website, but we decided to just briefly mention the one issue.

CONCLUSION

Based upon what we had seen and the evidence, as it stands. We are presently at the conclusion that her, the organization, and its leaders, are scamming desperate people out of their money. But, as it always stands within the WoC policy, should we find evidence that contradicts this information, we will happily revise this article.

Sources have, on seperate occasions, told us who she associates with. In fact, we have articles on several of them for corruption, etc. Currently, the only supporting evidence we have, is a video that Ms. Amato herself did. In the video, she makes mention of good people being slandered. It is, at this point, we briefly saw the profile of a person that we had deemed to be a very real danger to others. However, by all means, come to your own conclusions.

Cyber, internet safety, Uncategorized

Fighting the beast

We recently covered the complete destruction of Free speech within the Facebook Social Media site. Of course, we all know of the various accusations the platform has received even from the Senate. While Zuckerburg denied all of the accusations, the recent attacks on the media, and their owners, is apparent; now, it has come to us.

While WoC has not been “unpublished” unlike other platforms, the individual who started it all, has been placed on a 30 day ban for “hate speech.” The odd part to the ban is Facebook’s lack of transparency into what the hate speech actually was. To put this in lamens terms, he is banned and has no idea why.

One thing that does make this suspicious is the fact we openly endorsed/supported pages like “CopBlock,” “Free thought project,” and “Anti-Media.” All of these, and hundreds more, were suddenly and without reason, removed from Facebook. Perhaps, it is our belief in “Free speech” that they find to be “hate speech.”

As it stands, our lead journalist is in appeal number three, the other two being denied. Perhaps, it is at this time, advocates, activists, and journalists begin to give Facebook the legal president it apparently beckons for; yes, we are talking about a very large class action suit against the mega giant.

Of course, I digress. We already know this could never happen, we would never be able to rally that many people together. But what if it did? What grounds would they have?

Well, censorship of free speech is a big motivator. Most Americans can agree that free speech is a very important right they hold. So, if the Government can’s censor that right, why is a company allowed to? They would stake the claim that they own the servers and can run it as they please. This maybe true. However, federal laws apply. Censoring out platforms and people who oppose your own beliefs can only cause problems for the company; but this is Facebook we are talking about.

Because if is Facebook, WoC has actively began moving away from that platform. Because we pay for our own domain, we know that Facebook can’t keep us quiet and shut us down. We also know how to branch outward, and branching we are. Rather you agree with Facebook or not, all of us need to be aware that, at some point, we could become the next target of their censorship.

Uncategorized

Guilty of the “maybe.”

Image blurred to protect the identities of the parties in the photo. There is no evidence to support the the claims within the post.

The above post is an all to common accusation. So, being that we support innocent until proven guilty, we are going to objectively breakdown this post. As you can see, the images contain red boxes. These are areas of interest.

A young mother, name currently withheld, went to a location called “Bootanica. Like many places, we can presume this is a family based place. So, why is this guy so special?

In the above posting, the mother makes the claim that the man is a “potential pedophile.” Now, anybody who has been wrongfully accused of this, can tell you just how lethal a claim like this can be. The term itself, “potential,” implies a sense of doubt. She claims the man was staring at young girls, let’s address this.

Once again they are at a busy location, this is later stated by the poster. Behind this man, is a young girl who is apparently with him. Now, this is where it becomes a bit of a contradiction. She states that she, in fact, was watching them closely. The girl, sitting down, did not appear to be in any distress. So, it can be presumed that she felt rather safe with this man.

Now, as most people do, they tend to glance or watch people as they pass. So, if somebody walks by you and you look at them, does that mean you are “up to no good?” No. Only a complete nimrod would make that claim. By nature, humans just tend to observe their surroundings.

Now the poster goes on to claim that an unknown father suggests he was following her. Again, let’s crack this egg. Looking at the unblurred image, it is clear this location has sidewalks. She says there were “thousands of people” there. With that said, I can bet a lot of people were “following” her…or maybe just going in the same direction?

Keep in mind, however, this is just a theory. I am thinking that he was a guy spending time with his daughter, and had the misfortune of crossing this paranoid woman’s path. It is claims like this that ruin people’s lives. Because of false claims, or claims with no actual evidence, people have had dealings with CPS, delt with depression, and even developed PTSD from the experience. So, when making a claim that somebody is a pedophile, please have more than a story to enforce it.

Business relations, Cyber, Uncategorized

War on Media

If you have been on Facebook recently, chances are you have noticed several media platforms that have gone silent. CopBlock, Free thought project, The anti-media are just a few to have been taken down by the infamous Facebook company.

Although surprising, we honestly can’t be shocked by this move. With a history of privacy issues, constitutional violations, and censorship concerns, Facebook steps the bar up once again. The first move made by the company was the option to report “fake news.” While this may seem harmless, it gave Facebook the ability to remove any platform that went against its own political agendas; naturally, we see police accountability and independent platforms removed.

For the platforms that still remain, this should be revered as a serious concern. After all, the pages taken down had millions of followers, where most of us don’t. It is no longer a question of “if” Facebook will take us down, but when?

Because of this concern, “WoC” has already began making plans. Being that we often shared postings from the now removed platforms, we know that being under the radar is impossible. We have simply covered to many controversial areas. Rather it be police brutality, CPS, corrupt courts, and even went toe-to-toe with a very questionable 501c3, it is likely that we will be removed soon.

But what of Facebook? What will happen to it enlight of these actions? Already people have began leaving the site. Independent Social Medias have began to boom because of Facebook. The flaw with Facebook is ot relies on advertising to make money. Basically, they sell your information, use your information on your profile, to direct ads to you. Well, less people means less ads and equals to less money.

What Facebook has failed to realize is if everybody suddenly left their site, the company would literally go bankrupt. In a huge way, the masses have more control than what Zuckerberg is willing to admit.

Uncategorized

Silence

For sometime now, War on Corruption has been relatively silent. There are many reasons for this, all will be addressed here. This article is primarily an update, an explanation behind this silence. In other words, you deserve an explanation.

501c3: 2017

If you followed WoC last year, than you may already be aware of this situation. However, if you hadn’t, here we go. Last year, MAFA LLC, ran by Rosemary Dalton, came under attack. More specifically, she was attacked in various ways, including religious beliefs.

As a long time friend of the organization, and Ms. Dalton, we took a stand against the slanderous events unfolding. It was, to our dismay, the attack was refocused on us. The primary method of attack was the pedophile claim.

Although nothing actually confirmed the attack, the attack was repeated over a course of about 8 months. Our founder attempted to get an EPO against Phil Worland and his 501c3 and was met with a summons to a Missouri court; the victim, our founder, was issued an epo, regardless of the obvious evidence displaying he was the victim.

Witnesses attending the small Troy, MO. court, have all agreed that it was clear that the instigator, stalker, etc. knew the people working in the court, judge included. Thankfully, this EPO ran out on 09/02/2018, giving us the ability to discuss this in plain view.

Our founder, following these events, had what I can only describe as a complete mental breakdown. At this time, I made the decision to place him on sabbatical and operate WoC whenever I was able to.

Work

As most may not be aware, “War on Corruption,” is completely funded out of our pockets. This means that, due to the attacks of 2017, us losing an investment that we nearly obtained, we are now struggling to keep this platform going. Currently, we are discussing the possibilities of accepting contributions; at this time, we have made no final decision regarding this matter.

Updates

As of this article, we are planning to resume our normal functions, getting the cobwebs out of the gears, if you will. The attacks had gone silent around 02/2018. As we have been informed, by multiple sources, the attacker, and associated people, eventually lost all merit and are no longer a threat. With this article, WoC returns.

Business relations, internet safety, Uncategorized

The Facebook commentary

Anybody who has ever heard of the infamous social media site, Facebook, is probably already aware of the numerous contraversies surrounding it. With this in mind, we shouldn’t be all to surprised that the site has been violating privacy laws in its collection of personal data.

As you maybe aware, or not, anything you post to Facebook is considered fair game. So, that boyfriend/girlfriend breaking up with you post…don’t be surprised when you start getting ads for dating sites. Now, that collection of information is not what we are here to discuss.

If you go to your account settings, there is an option to download a copy of what Facebook has collected on you. Upon doing this, I found that they had more information than what they legally should have. Text messages, my phone contacts, etc. are just a couple of things they had stolen from my personal phone. So, is collecting this information legal? No.

In order for law enforcement to obtain this information, they must first get a warrant. To get a warrant, they must have probable cause. Now, because Facebook is not law enforcement, they cannot obtain a warrant. However, they can conduct internal investigations if you are employed with them. So what does this have to say about their collection information on you?

Your text messages, your contact list, who you called, the duration of said call, etc., Facebook obtained in violation of Federal privacy laws. Because they cannot obtain a warrant, shrouded their collection in secrecy, and made no attempt to inform people, we now see the newest hashtag, #DeleteFacebook.

With this hashtag trending, it does make us wonder rather or not Facebook has finally come to its end. Although, there will always be people associated with the Social media site, alternative sites have taken this oppurtunity to grow their user bases. Given the extensive, and yet, contraversial history of Facebook, leaving the mega site may not be a bad idea.

Uncategorized

Advocates: who to get

As you can imagine, no person decides to get an advocate because they enjoy it. Sadly, esecially in the CPS/DFS arena, people get them as a defense against a corrupted system. However, just as there are real advocates, you must also be very careful as many are fake.

You see this a lot jn the Facebook world. Individuals, FB organizations, even legal 501c3 organizations claiming the “advocate”  badge. However, just because I claim a dog meows, does not mean the dog meows. So, when placing the future of your family into the hands of an advocate, what should you look for?

The first, and most important, are their credentials. What I mean by credentials is simply this: are they qualified to do the work to which you are needing. If you need an advocate, are they licensed? Now, this may not seem like a big deal, but it is. To simply state, a license determines rather or not they can advocate for you in the courtroom.

A misconception people often make is they are safe with a 501c3 organization; this is simply not true. If the organization is not licensed to do the work to which they are performing, than they are a threat to you. Sadly, I can name off the top of my head at least three organizations operating illegally.

Don’t choose an advocate lightly, you are fighting for your life and therefore you want somebody who is not only legal, but has a good reputation. Below is a list that I hope will assist you in choosing one.

1. Does the advocate/organization have a license to conduct the work you are needing?

2. Is their reputation in good standing? This is important. If an advocate is known to release their clients information, you want to steer clear. I added this because I know of one that has done this.

3. Do they have an extensive criminal history? Sadly, this matters in the court system. To the courts it wouldn’t look good if your advocate is a repeated felon.

4. Do they work with their clients? You don’t want an advocate that goes silent on you. You want to always be informed of what they are doing for your case.

5. Is my privacy safe with them? This goes back to number 2. You don’t want to work with somebody who has maliciously released case details regarding current/past clients. Even if they did it once, this is one time to many and you may want to steer clear of them.

The above is just a basic outline for you. From it, you can expand, ask questions! You want to obtain as much information about the proposed advocate as possible. If you feel they are misleading, you get a “bad vibe” from them, terminate the interview and move onto somebody else.