War on Corruption

The fight for truth

  • About WoC
  • Bill of Rights
  • Collaborating with WoC
  • United States Constitution

Judge and jury

Posted by War on Corruption on August 14, 2017
Posted in: Uncategorized.

Recently, War on Corruption recieved the biggest blow we could had anticipated, the loss of one of our own. As some of you maybe aware, our lead journalist and friend, Matt, recently resigned from his own platform. With his loss, however, we have continued to push forward as best we can.

It was with much hesitation that he made the call to leave. “We both know this psychopath will stop at nothing to destroy me as a person; we both know I will fall,” the solemn explanation behind his choice. For months, the rest of us had watched the malicious attack, the alteration of information as a 501c3 continued to violate, not only its own bylaws, but the law as well.

As of the time of this writing, Matt attempted to obtain a protection order. However, due to the interaction being third party, it was declined. As a result, past he has spoken to me, he has fled his childhood town and is now in hiding; meanwhile, the assailant filed a retalitory order.

The issue here has hit critical levels. When a man gives up everything he worked toward, flees his home in fear, and gives his passwords to those he trusts in hopes his work will continue, this is a problem. While our dozens of contacts continue to collect evidence in defense of our friend, the assailant continues to destroy his image.

However, he isn’t the only one who is being called a pedophile. When we checked back into the evidence we had gathered for Matt, a pattern was made clear. Rosemary, Deb, Bob, Carrie, Matt, and Paul are just a few who have been given the pedo belt by the assailant. Now, let’s break down a pattern.

The assailant and Matt had a falling out over a year ago over an article he

had apparently written. In this article, he questioned the assailant’s ability to operate an organization, why? The reason was due to a woman he was attacking on his group (group name withheld.)

Deb, Bob, Carrie, and Paul all had falling outs with the assailant over various reasons. While, to some extent, a hack did occur, it was not a true hack. In reality, from what we have seen, the assailant’s accounts were accessed using their password, this is a hijack, not a hack. The other thing to note here is this, Deb and Carrie were board members of the attacking organization. As for Rosemary, she was a client, he was her advocate during a DFS case. When she defended her friend against the pedophile claim, she too was made a target.

The pattern here should be obvious. All of these people have two things in common:

1. They all angered the assailant.

2. They all were his friends who had some form of falling out with the unsub.

As a result, all of these people have been deemed pedophiles or pedophile enablers. The same accusation for so many people? When you truly reflect on this concept, one has to wonder, “how valid are these claims?” “Why the obsession on pedophiles?” And, of course, “how does one end up being surrounded by so many, if they actually were?”

There really is no way to answer what is going on in the assailant’s head, if anything at all. What we can see is a clear sign of mental instability. In fact, this instability was so severe that one woman got a protection order, a man fled his home, and they are all working on legal action.

The entire situation reminds me of a child who has had his candy stolen. He cries to mommy, for attention, and he throws a tantrum. For this situation, the tantrum went to far. While I still remain in contact with Matt, it is certain to presume that he has no intention of returning to War on Corruption. It is, with that act, an incompetent loon won.

501c3 evidence: screenshots

Posted by War on Corruption on August 10, 2017
Posted in: Uncategorized.

This information demonstrates the harassment commenced on several individuals by the unsub. You will see information that also gives a glimpse unto the mindset of the individual. As of now, our lead journalist has had a protection order filed against him. Just as it was in Ms. Dalton’s case, it was done maliciously and as a form of retaliation, a crime we plan to pursue. This information is being provided as is. For this reason, duplicates may exist. The following images are provided so that:

1. Other victims may have easy access to evidence for their cases.

2. A warning to victims who have yet to be revictimized.

3. To demonstrate the reality of how the subject represents himself, his organization, and his clients.

War on Corruption is providing this information solely for informational purposes as well as a form of legal documentation for other victims. We will, as with the other, update this as needed.

wp-image-595895010

While attempting to sever a six year friendship Ms. Kemble attempted to convince me to close WoC.

wp-image-623059493

Because he felt our lead journalist “slandered” him, we are making these gallaries. You can decide for yourself.

wp-image-150613898wp-image--2143754350wp-image--1718499388wp-image-536617147wp-image--1647518235wp-image-1390003473wp-image-133857278wp-image--258847586wp-image--2064197072wp-image-1395863528wp-image-1086620380wp-image-1424443295wp-image--710346401wp-image--540461134wp-image-1554264187wp-image-1824361665wp-image--119602575wp-image-1184364054wp-image-589959827wp-image--2033775330wp-image-186646061wp-image-1659984310wp-image-35305679wp-image--1746635880wp-image--202422388wp-image-1513514419wp-image--57602640wp-image--682566421wp-image--206965998wp-image--300410649

501c3 slanders people: complete evidence gallary (updated 8-15-17)

Posted by War on Corruption on August 6, 2017
Posted in: Cyber, internet safety, police relations, terrorism, Uncategorized.

The information provided here is done so with two reasons in mind.

1. Other victims can file lawsuits against 501c3 U.B.F.U.C.T. and its president.

2. For informational reasons.

PDFS/photos captured

Update 8-15-17

Scroll and you will see where he randomly attacked a person. In a PM, the target was told to “lick a sh#### d###.” The justification was the target was Matt. Yet another lie with no merit.

https://1drv.ms/b/s!Ahg5yh8fxlA9hXaYkqMGp-NlEzoi

The first pdf taken of “The truth is out!!” wall.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B45UIQf_2BCBVlpkTjhNQkNpdWs/view?usp=drivesdk

The following versions exist because the admin removed various slanderous postings.

complete wall update 2

Phil: violation 3

The following PDF is where it all publically started.

initial thread

When our lead journalist came to the defense of Rosemary and M.A.F.A., Mr. Worland began a smear campaign against him and our platform. This is clearly shown below.

“exposure” slandering begins

provocation attempt

At this point, Matt was actually attempting to salvage his reputation. Due to the extreme nature of the slanderings, our platform is currently petitioning a lawsuit.

slanders Matt…again

However, the slandering didn’t stop at just him.

Phil smears Judi

Even with 20+ victims, he still has time to violate a protection order.

PO violation 2

Response when served with an EPO

epo response

Even makes time to retarget Cindy

targets Cindy

This post would begin nearly four months of hell…a hell that some of the victims are now reliving due to Mr. Worland’s dangerous instability.

post pt 1

post pt 2

Regardless of the fact a state judge has informed Mr. Worland that Matt is NOT a pedophile, he maintains his stance. This is just one case in which he makes the accusation.

phil calls matt a pedo

Mr. Worland began a mass campaign against all people who befriended Rosemary. Zoƫ, who has had no contact with him prior to this, became a target, as did Kara.

phil attacks Zoe

Beyond all of the previous disturbing evidences, there are also indirect threats.

phil makes indirect threat

Yet another smear campaign

Phil smears Rosemary and MAFA

In yet another instance, Phil calls Matt a pedophile. The case he used is one that:

A: did not involve children.

B: was closed due to several contradictions in witness accounts that lead to a rule 6 hearing for lack of evidence.

Phil calls matt a pedo…again

This post is his recap of a protection order, that is in effect. The very post violated the order.

Phil P.O. post

As if his terror toward people was not enough, he recruited a team to further harass, torment, and mentally drive people to their breaking point. One individual has clinical depression, Phil has targeted, and had his friends, target them the most.

Linda attacks victim

In regards to Linda Hickey aka Linda Clanahan, if you go to Missouri casenet, type in the Clanahan name, you will see half a dozen convictions for stalking.

On June 17, we got this audio recording. It is a phone call between Jason Dover, Phil’s best friend, and Rosemary.

Jason chat recording.wav

Becky Kemble harasses Matt’s mother, alleging him to be a pedophile. You can see how bad that goes as she did not get her desired response.

Becky harasses Matt’s mother.

UPDATE:

According to Matt, Phil yelled at him outside the courthouse…where several witnesses heard, including an attorney who was crossing the street at the time.att is currently in discussions of filing lawsuits against, both, Mr. Worland and his organization. Below, we are submitting information regarding Missouri harassment laws in hopes that he grow up, move forward, and cease further acts of harassment.

harassment law 1

Missouri harassment law 2

Missouri Stalking law 1

There are countless laws on this.

EVIDENCE UPDATE 1

he day prior to the attacks on M.A.F.A, its founder, and our lead journalist, it was made abundantly clear that he intended to target various people.

One such individual, Luis Ewing, was accused of being oyr lead, Matt. We can only speculate that the last name is the reason.

Following that, are the results from the national sex offenders database. Although a judge has already confirmed Mr. Ewing to not be a pedophile, Mr. Worland continues to make the claim.

wp-image-1951264923 The national database confirming that our lead is NOT on the registry. Below that, Phil himself confirms this. He would later retract this statement. However, this statement has unknowingly tied the noose in his rope should Matt file suit.

wp-image--176498409wp-image--281427196wp-image--2072504236The following picture, he confesses that he forced one victim into doing what she wanted. He, again smears Matt. However, at no point has Matt ever claimed to be an advocate. It is, at this point, Mr. Worland’s intention becomes clear; it is purely a personal vendetta against Mr. Ewing for standing up to him.wp-image-172401627wp-image-1066927926The following picture confirms our claim: Mr. Worland’s malicious slander is driven off the fact that our lead journalist protected a close friend. Following that, Mr. Worland attacks and degrades Ms. Dalton.wp-image-2115267890wp-image--1344081427wp-image-1491584082A discussion from one of Mr. Worland’s friends. Following this discussion, she was banned.wp-image--1831774219wp-image--1990144010

Cyber trafficking

Posted by War on Corruption on August 5, 2017
Posted in: Cyber, internet safety, Uncategorized.

Disclaimer: due to the nature of the discussed site, we have opted to withold its name and url. We are currently trying to find ways to have taken down.

With the internet, comes information unlike anything we have ever seen. Cultures, religions, recipes, there are trillions of things that are just a click away. However, hidden within all of this information, literally in plain sight, is the world of child trafficking.

Recently, a site has caught the attention of several “pedo hunters.” The site, much like photobucket, is a place where anybody can share anything…we mean anything. While you will see pictures of nature, families, and so on, this site has a more sinister side to it.

If you were, for example, to click into specific categories, such as “kids,” you are instantly brought into a pedophile sharing page topic upon topic of illegally exploited children. It is, for this reason, we are witholding the url.

The website in question has children ranging from infants to 18 years of age. The images, can become extremely graphic in nature. Children seen in sexually based stances, the comments applauding the abuse. So, why has nothing been done?

Because the website is based outside of the United States, it limits the ability our government has to shutting it down. The only thing we could do, in reality, is report it to that countrys’ authorities; a procedure that can become very complicated in nature. But, then there is the more disturbing reason: nobody has actually taken the time to report it.

Websites such as this are not only becoming more common, they are becoming more bold. Normally, people are lead to believe these sites solely exists within the “dark web.” However, this is not true. Sites such as this, are hiding in plain sight, waiting for unsuspecting people to click into them.

However, it doesn’t end there. With apps such as kik, live.me, etc. the availability of plausible child victims has increased. Kids, who may just want to livestream their daily events, are finding themselves preyed upon by deviants. Through coarsion, fear, and blackmail, these innocent kids are lead into the underground world of the internet.

Child predators often use such tactics to get everything from nudes to physical meetups with children. In some cases, children are forced into the human trafficking world. In cases such as this, they are often never found.

This isn’t just about internet safety, this is about making people aware, to open their eyes, and to protect their children. This is just an example of why every parent should teach internet safety and restrict the content visible to their child(ren.) Yes, the above site does exist, and yes it is not alone. You do have the key to shut sites like this down, utilize it.

Girl rapes dog, police do nothing

Posted by War on Corruption on July 29, 2017
Posted in: internet safety, police relations, Uncategorized. Tagged: eau claire, whitney wisconsin.

A rather contraversial, and taboo, subject is beastiality. For Amy Lynn Lew, aka Whitney Wisconsin, it is just daily life. Initially when we got this case, we had turned it away. The reason was, because upon investigation, we confirmed Amy to be a legit. We decided to contact police, in response.

Initially, when we looked into her, we were at the conclusion that she was a cyber troll seeking views and reactions. And so, we did a widespread search on her. Naturally, we found her contraversial Youtube videos discussing why women should commence in beastiality. And then, to our dismay, we found her beastiality videos.

For instance, in one such video, a dog is seen licking her genitalia. At first, we weren’t sure if it was her, how do we prove otherwise? Near the end of this video she pans the camera revealing her face. At this point, we had all the evidence that we needed.

During my discussion with the Eau Claire police department, I had learned several disturbing facts. According to the officer, they currently have had over 500 calls regarding “Whitney.” However, that wasn’t the worst of it.

Upon thanking me, he leaked out some very disturbing information. As it turns out, the department has been aware of these sick videos for nearly two years! It is, at this point, I realized the department opted into doing nothing regarding the animal abuse.

It amazes me that any department would allow this criminal act to go on. It blows my mind that it would be ignored for nearly two years. What this young woman is doing is appauling. However, it is equally so that the police have taken no action against her.

Advocate wars: reflection

Posted by War on Corruption on July 19, 2017
Posted in: CPS, Cyber, internet safety, Uncategorized.

DISCLAIMER: This article is, in no way, discussing any individual parties. It is purely an observational article. The opinions of this article may not reflect that of the entire WoC team.

In recent times, we have all beared witness to what has to be described as the worst “advocate” war in recent history. Anon vs. anon, entire organizations halted, people being slandered beyond repair. All of this for what purpose? In what way has this “war” helped anybody?

The first thing we must understand is the core of this war. This war can be broken down into two teams. On one side, we have a team that “exposes” members of the other team. However, we have members of the other team doing the same. Because of this, a fuel is constantly being thrown into the already burning fire.

So if this war is constantly going on, if people are constantly envoking fear, slander and threats to one another, who is protecting the overall cause? Simple answer: nobody. How can anybody be for protecting children if they cannot even unite? Looking into the fire, one can easily tell that CPS and the corrupt system is more united than those allegedly fighting it.

While advocates, organizations, and anons alike, wage war on one another, the system gains momentum, human trafficking goes unnoticed, CPS abducts kids…the atrocities go on and on. Worst part is, those fighting these crimes are to focused on pettyness.

The overall war may as well be described like this: a group of kids want to play on the merry-go-round. However, everybody wants the orange colored seat. What happens? There is nobody to push it, all the weight is on one side, it becomes off balance.

Everybody has a place, a role. Everybody has a responsibility to that place and role. So far, it seems like everybody is concerned with what the other person is doing. Stop, who cares? Worry about your fight against the real corruption. Worry about victim children. Stop making victims, stop the petty name calling, and just do you.

Facebook: war on innocence

Posted by War on Corruption on June 9, 2017
Posted in: Business relations, Cyber, internet safety, Uncategorized. Tagged: Anonymous, censorship, civil rights, constitution, corruption, Facebook.

If you have been on Facebook for any length of time, chances are you already know that they optionally enforce their policies. And why not? They are the biggest social media platform on Earth. Not a big deal, right? Wrong!

Because of the random enforcement of their policies, numerous crimes are conducted via their platform daily. While some of these crimes are minor, some are very serious crimes. Just to name a few: drug trade, human trafficking, child pornography, bullying, and various forms of terrorism.

While drug trading is a crime, it isn’t one worth discussing in this article. However, we are going to discuss human trafficking and child pornography together. The reason we are combining them is purely due to how they relate.

If you search around on Facebook long enough, eventually you may come across some “kiddie” groups or profiles. Often times these groups are closed, some are secret, but once in awhile you find an open group. 

Over the years I have come across hundreds of these groups. I did what any rational person should do, I reported it to Facebook. So, I did a great deed, I helped some family whos’  children were being preyed on. But, Facebook actually allowed the group to remain.

And so, because Facebook is so poorly operated, this message is what you will get. However, this doesn’t happen to just groups, this also applies to other victims.

Another area to which we see the piss poor operations of Facebook, is in the harassment/bullying arena. In many cases, you get the standard “we aren’t doing anything about it” message. In other cases, we have seen the bully report the victims’ profile successfully; this sends a huge message. This message is simply: 

If you break the law while using Facebook, don’t worry, we are on your side. However, if you are a victim, you are not subject to be protected while on our site.

Regardless of the proven, and yet dangerous effects this has, Facebook remains selective on how its policies are enforced.

The reason is simple, however. Facebook makes X amount of dollars per profile/page. So, the more they have, the more money they make. In theory, the more money you make Facebook via posts, pics, etc., the less likely they are to enforce policy on you. Simply put, they want you to make revenue for them.

With the rising of social medias such as “MeWe” and “empowr,” it is very plausible that Facebook will soon have a run for its money. That, however, does not phase them. For right now, the mega giant continues its poor enforcement and management of its policies.

Posts navigation

← Older Entries
Newer Entries →
  • Recent Posts

    • The Facebook commentary
    • Advocates: who to get
    • Henry: Fame has come!
    • Private investigation law: Missouri
    • Investigations: who can do it?
  • Recent Comments

    banagainstcorruption on Official WoC statement regardi…
    banagainstcorruption on A hen in the foxhole.
    Blackhorn33 on In the shadows: child predator…
    Activists-Alliance on In the shadows: child predator…
    Blackhorn33 on In the shadows: child predator…
  • Archives

    • March 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • October 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • January 2015
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • December 2013
  • Categories

    • Business relations
    • CPS
    • Cyber
    • internet safety
    • police relations
    • terrorism
    • Uncategorized
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.com
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 208 other followers

  • War on Corruption

    War on Corruption
WordPress.com.
War on Corruption
WordPress.com.
Cancel