Category Archives: terrorism

Investigations: who can do it?

You see it all the time in the world of Facebook. Some idiot decides to make an accusation, such as my situation, and runs their own “investigation.” What you don’t see, or may not know, are the legalities of these actions. So, it is to say, I am going to give you the tools you need to wipe the floor with such brainless adolecents.

Investigations

First off, there are actual laws regarding the method to which an investigation is conducting, even within a workplace. While a company can conduct an internal investigation, this only applies to its current employees or those employed at the time the investigation began; this applies to 501c3, and other organizations as well.

Now, in this situation, if a company, or 501c3 is conducting an investigation on you, and you were never employed by them, they are breaking the law. It goes back to that magic word: internal investigation. Furthermore, if the investigation is being conducted in a harassing or malicious manner, that is also illegal.

No company, or 501c3 can conduct an external investigation unless licensed to do so. If they are not licensed to conduct one, that gives the investigative target legal grounds. Furthermore, if the findings are being shared via social media, it is now libel slander unless you can establish loss.

A loss can include friends, employment, etc. If any of these things have happened as a result of the fraudulant investigation, you can now sue for Defamation of character. For a 501c3, this is especially hurtful as you can actually sue for the revocation of its non profit status, removal of its president, or for ownership of the organization itself. To put this kindly, you can destroy an entire organization if they have committed this crime.

Who can conduct an investigation?

Alright, so there are a variety of agencies and people who can actually conduct an investigation.

Local and state police, FBI, etc. If we branch out to the civilian world, private investigators. What do all of these people have in common? All of them have obtained a license to do so. Law enforcement are granted this right via the state. Private investigators are given a license to conduct such investigation. If the person conducting one is not licensed to do so, any and all findings ars null and void, their evidence is useless in court. Firthermore, if they are blasting it on social media, the courts could rule that null as well, not to mention the ratifications of conducting the illegal investigation.

If the investigation is on your past, for example, a closed case, you could call double jepordy, especially if the “evidence” is being used against you. You can claim they are enacting as an unlawful court and are, essentially, placing you on trial once again; this is where social media can turn dark for offending parties.

To conduct this style of investigation, is very much illegal. Here, I will give you the breached law categories:

1. Stalking.

2. Harassment.

3. (Cyber) bullying.

4. Libel slander.

5. Defamation of character.

6. Conducting an unlawful investigation.

This, my friends, is your ammunition to fight back. If you are a victim of this, do not wait for it to just vanish, it rarely does. Take action, begin legal proceedings, and pdf anything posted to any social media platform that contains slander; this is how you end such slander. Do it right, keep it legal.

501c3 slanders people: complete evidence gallary (updated 8-15-17)

The information provided here is done so with two reasons in mind.

1. Other victims can file lawsuits against 501c3 U.B.F.U.C.T. and its president.

2. For informational reasons.

PDFS/photos captured

Update 8-15-17

Scroll and you will see where he randomly attacked a person. In a PM, the target was told to “lick a sh#### d###.” The justification was the target was Matt. Yet another lie with no merit.

https://1drv.ms/b/s!Ahg5yh8fxlA9hXaYkqMGp-NlEzoi

The first pdf taken of “The truth is out!!” wall.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B45UIQf_2BCBVlpkTjhNQkNpdWs/view?usp=drivesdk

The following versions exist because the admin removed various slanderous postings.

complete wall update 2

Phil: violation 3

The following PDF is where it all publically started.

initial thread

When our lead journalist came to the defense of Rosemary and M.A.F.A., Mr. Worland began a smear campaign against him and our platform. This is clearly shown below.

“exposure” slandering begins

provocation attempt

At this point, Matt was actually attempting to salvage his reputation. Due to the extreme nature of the slanderings, our platform is currently petitioning a lawsuit.

slanders Matt…again

However, the slandering didn’t stop at just him.

Phil smears Judi

Even with 20+ victims, he still has time to violate a protection order.

PO violation 2

Response when served with an EPO

epo response

Even makes time to retarget Cindy

targets Cindy

This post would begin nearly four months of hell…a hell that some of the victims are now reliving due to Mr. Worland’s dangerous instability.

post pt 1

post pt 2

Regardless of the fact a state judge has informed Mr. Worland that Matt is NOT a pedophile, he maintains his stance. This is just one case in which he makes the accusation.

phil calls matt a pedo

Mr. Worland began a mass campaign against all people who befriended Rosemary. Zoƫ, who has had no contact with him prior to this, became a target, as did Kara.

phil attacks Zoe

Beyond all of the previous disturbing evidences, there are also indirect threats.

phil makes indirect threat

Yet another smear campaign

Phil smears Rosemary and MAFA

In yet another instance, Phil calls Matt a pedophile. The case he used is one that:

A: did not involve children.

B: was closed due to several contradictions in witness accounts that lead to a rule 6 hearing for lack of evidence.

Phil calls matt a pedo…again

This post is his recap of a protection order, that is in effect. The very post violated the order.

Phil P.O. post

As if his terror toward people was not enough, he recruited a team to further harass, torment, and mentally drive people to their breaking point. One individual has clinical depression, Phil has targeted, and had his friends, target them the most.

Linda attacks victim

In regards to Linda Hickey aka Linda Clanahan, if you go to Missouri casenet, type in the Clanahan name, you will see half a dozen convictions for stalking.

On June 17, we got this audio recording. It is a phone call between Jason Dover, Phil’s best friend, and Rosemary.

Jason chat recording.wav

Becky Kemble harasses Matt’s mother, alleging him to be a pedophile. You can see how bad that goes as she did not get her desired response.

Becky harasses Matt’s mother.

UPDATE:

According to Matt, Phil yelled at him outside the courthouse…where several witnesses heard, including an attorney who was crossing the street at the time.att is currently in discussions of filing lawsuits against, both, Mr. Worland and his organization. Below, we are submitting information regarding Missouri harassment laws in hopes that he grow up, move forward, and cease further acts of harassment.

harassment law 1

Missouri harassment law 2

Missouri Stalking law 1

There are countless laws on this.

EVIDENCE UPDATE 1

he day prior to the attacks on M.A.F.A, its founder, and our lead journalist, it was made abundantly clear that he intended to target various people.

One such individual, Luis Ewing, was accused of being oyr lead, Matt. We can only speculate that the last name is the reason.

Following that, are the results from the national sex offenders database. Although a judge has already confirmed Mr. Ewing to not be a pedophile, Mr. Worland continues to make the claim.

wp-image-1951264923 The national database confirming that our lead is NOT on the registry. Below that, Phil himself confirms this. He would later retract this statement. However, this statement has unknowingly tied the noose in his rope should Matt file suit.

wp-image--176498409wp-image--281427196wp-image--2072504236The following picture, he confesses that he forced one victim into doing what she wanted. He, again smears Matt. However, at no point has Matt ever claimed to be an advocate. It is, at this point, Mr. Worland’s intention becomes clear; it is purely a personal vendetta against Mr. Ewing for standing up to him.wp-image-172401627wp-image-1066927926The following picture confirms our claim: Mr. Worland’s malicious slander is driven off the fact that our lead journalist protected a close friend. Following that, Mr. Worland attacks and degrades Ms. Dalton.wp-image-2115267890wp-image--1344081427wp-image-1491584082A discussion from one of Mr. Worland’s friends. Following this discussion, she was banned.wp-image--1831774219wp-image--1990144010