Category Archives: police relations

children, cold case, CPS, Free Article, Law Enforcement, Media, Opinions, Police, police relations, predatory, terrorism, Uncategorized

American Gestapo: A victim speaks

No agency has encountered as much controversy, or hatred, as that of CPS/DFS. The courts are rigged, the families destroyed, and the countless children who go missing are just a few of the problems within these agencies. But what of the children who grew up? What stories could they tell? While ‘War on Corruption’ does not cover individual cases, we are going to share one story from a survivor; a case that CPS tried, with success, to cover up. In this article, I am going to share the personal story of what my siblings and I endured as a direct result of the Oklahoma CPS system.

The nightmare begins

The day was nothing special, in fact, it was like any other day. My parents were in the process of remodeling the bedroom while we did what every child does, which included running around the house and playing. Out of nowhere, a woman stood outside, with police, knocking on the front door. She introduced herself as Deborah McCullah, a caseworker for the Pottowatomi county CPS department.

The confusion on my parents’ faces was obvious, as was the fear. The caseworker stated that they had gotten a report and needed to look around the house to ensure it was safe. At the end, she recommended removal, but the officers disagreed. She would return the following day, with different officers, and our nightmare was set into motion.

With the police, the caseworker proceeded to walk us to the car. Although we were in tears, at no point can I recall her displaying any form of compassion. For her, it was purely sick enjoyment. She then gave my parents a court-date, which would ultimately be false. After that, we rode with this stange, and evil woman, to the courthouse.

There was a family who lived across the street. Within that family was the neighborhood gossip. In other words, she was in everybody’s business. When we were abducted, she had overheard the caseworker instruct the police to take us to the courthouse for court. Once we were gone, our neighbor had informed our parents.

Prior to being placed into a foster family, the three of us were interviewed. They didn’t interview my fourth sibling because she was an infant. The interviews asked how often our parents had hurt us, abused us, and even asked how often my father would molest us. The problem with their interview was simply this: none of these things had ever taken place. When the interview process failed, the caseworker than began her attempt to brainwash us. I recall being told that I needed to tell the judge that we had been abused. She elaborated by telling me that if I did, we would be allowed to go back home, a promise she had no intention of keeping for words I would never say.

A house of no hope

After the court, we would spend the following week in a shelter. I remember loving this place as it had all sorts of toys, gaming systems, and even had an outside area. While I did like it there, I would spend my time outside, looking for ways to which I could climb their fence and run; I would never have that chance.

After a week, we were introduced to Jesse and Stan, the foster parents who would ultimately make our lives a true hell. Initially, they appeared to be kind, but that was a cover for the monsters inside. We rode with them to their house, they showed us to our rooms, and we had dinner with their family. This first night would be the only time we would ever see any form of kindness from them.

The Abuse

the abuse started off minor, in comparason to what would ultimately unfold. The father started out with sitting me in a chair, located in a cold garage. He would tie my arms to it, before placing underwear, which was filled with feces, on my head. It was here that I would spend most of my time outside of school. As the months progressed, so did the abuse.

I was sitting on their couch, watching television, after school. Out of nowhere, I felt a hand grab my hair and proceeded to yank me up. Naturally, I attempted to break free but I was simply to weak to do so. After being forced into the restroom, forced to bend over their tub, I felt my pants go down. I recall trying to look behind me, only for my head to be forced to look at the bottom of the tub…and then severe pain. This would become a near daily ritual.

The abuse would continue to intensify, entering the domain of torture. With the sodomy came being burned with hot water, forced to sleep outside in the cold, and even being water-boarded. On several occassions, I would be held down on the garage floor by one of their biological kids. The foster dad would get a wet rag and simply allow the water to drip onto my head. As with all of the previous abuses, this would also become a sort of ritual. Somehow, the foster parents justified their abuse by claimimg that I deserved it.

Being made aware of the torture and abuse, my parents tried to fight back. They made CPS aware of the situation. However, the agency that claims to protect children, simply stated that I was lying out of retaliation for being taken. As a result of their “protection,” I would be forced to live with my abusers as CPS began work to cover it up. CPS took the only step they could, at that time, to cover up the abuse. Within days of me reporting it to my parents, the agency would have me sent to a psychiatric hospital. With that act, they could then discredit any claim I had made.

Returning home

Eventually my siblings and I were returned home, the abusive foster family out of our lives. CPS, on the other hand, contimued to prey over my family, an act they still do. The siblings who remembered our time in this human trafficking ring with me, were left with an abundant array of trauma, many to which I still deal with to this day.

As I got older, I learned to accept that these traumas were now apart of who I am. However, I would not accept that these traumas made me a victim. Instead, I sought out to become the survivor, to expose this system for what it truly is, and just maybe, save another innocent child from enduring the same traumas I had suffered. While CPS continues to deny my claims. I took comfort in knowing that a couple of my siblings were old enough to recall the abuse. With that confirmation, I began my war.

children, CPS, Free Article, Law Enforcement, Media, Opinions, Police, police relations, Politics, predatory, terrorism, Uncategorized

CPS/DFS: A system of abuse

Across America, each year, thousands of lives are abruptly disrupted by one of the most abusive systems in our government’s expansive arsenal: the CPS/DFS family court. While the government has seemingly waged war on American citizens via the judicial system, law enforcement, and so on, none bring the same level of terror than this group. Where you have Constitutional backing in every other system, the CPS/DFS system plays an entirely new level of ball. Keeping with our platform’s trend to fight against a tyannical system, we will be exposing the crimes of these agencies.

The Family Court

From the moment a caseworker enters your life, the cards have already been stacked against you. What appears to be casual conversation is actually a plot to gather and twist information against you. From this initial interaction, the caseworker has one goal: take your child(ren) by any means possible.

The Family Court system is a circus unlike anything you will encounter. For any family, who is misfortuned enough to go through this, they will quickly learn things about themselves that, in often times, are complete fabrications. The CPS/DFS workers, under the act of purgery, will weave a story as to why the parents are unfit. Meanwhile, the parents are expected to defend themselves against a case that will most likely have no evidence.

CPS/DFS Game

During this time, the parents endure many forms of psychological trauma. They are forced into parenting classes, they are forced to pay ransom (child support,) they are forced into drug/alcohol testing, even if the case had nothing to do with this; the parents, at the hands of the corrupt system, are virtually broken down from the ground up.

As the parental game is played out, the children find themselves in an equally destructive game. With no assistance, they must learn to adapt to being legally abducted from those they love. Living with complete strangers, they can only hope the individuals, who have been poorly vetted, don’t abuse, sexually assault, or outright murder them. If the children are abused, or assaulted, they only have one guarantee: the CPS/DFS system will do its best to cover it up.

For the children who are forced into this system, a lifetime of psychological harm is an absolute, as with the parents. Even after the case is over, CPS/DFS will forever lurk around the families, like a venomous snake, waiting for a chance to strike. While some families are able to break away from the system, the reality is that they never truly break away. As a result, they are doomed to forever walk on a thin sheet of ice, hoping it will not break.

CPS, Free Article, Law Enforcement, Media, Opinions, Police, police relations, Politics, Uncategorized

A system of money: America’s legal system

For anybody who has dealings with the judicial system, it is clear that the system is in complete ruin. This is especially true for the innocent. The CPS/DFS system holds your children hostage, forcing families to jump through hoops. The criminal system are using the lives of people as tokens for convictions, not because of established guilt, but because it supplies the state with funding. In both cases, law enforcement are enacted for the frontline assault.

Family court circus

The CPS/DFS arena claim to be for protecting the children. However, as millions have, or will learn, they appear to only be protecting their income at the expense of families. Through manipulation, extortion, and abuse, the agenies force parents into submission. If the parents fail to submit, their children are adopted out. If the parents try to fight or envoke their Constitutionally protected rights, again, their children are adopted out.

For the families who do successfully beat this system, they are left with a lifetime of trauma. Many find themselves always looking over their shoulders, living in fear, and countless psychological traumas that take years to heal from, though they never fully recover.

Law enforcement/Corrections

For the broken system, law enforcement are the frontlines. For those who have the misfortune of dealing with them, they find themselves in a losing scenerio. This fact is especially true in criminal accusations, or if the officer simply thinks a crime has taken place. There is a great deal of trauma and stress that comes to the parties involved. Depression, anxiety, and anger are just a few examples. The defending party finds themselves in a war against a system that every reason to slam a conviction above anything else.

From the moment an investigation begins, the objective is to establish guilt, not conclude rather or not there is guilt to be established. The reason behind this is actually simple: convictions bring revenue to the state. In turn that brings revenue to the counties and investigating agencies. In other words, the defending parties become a bartering chip in a legalized scheme to get money.

After the investigation, there is a risk of being charged. This can be a terrifying thought, especially for somebody who is innocent. For those individuals, they face an entirely new enemy: a court system that thrives at the expense of your freedom. A highly questionable tactic used by this system comes in the forms of plea deals. These “deals” attempt to force an already terrified person into admitting guilt for a lessor sentence. Sadly, as a result to fear, many accept this in hopes of just moving on with their lives. Meanwhile, the state has destroyed what was potentially an innocent life without having to prove anything.

After the court system comes the risk of prison. While the prison system maintains thst it is about “correcting” the behavior, this is far from the reality. In fact, this system could be considered slave labor filled with abuse.

Prisons are controlled by the officers. However, they are primarily operated by the inmates. The inmates hold various jobs, though they may only make around $2.00-$5.00 a week, if they’re lucky. The inmates run the risk of being attacked by both, fellow inmates and the gaurds. If attacked by fellow inmates, the only thing they can do is hope the gaurds come to the rescue. If for whatever reason the attacker is a gaurd, there won’t be any assistance.

In cases to which a gaurd has to get physical with an inmate, an investigation into it will be conducted. Sadly for the inmate, that investigation is conducted by the very prison to which they reside. As a result, there is a very high chance that it will simply be closed with all consequences going to the inmate.

Conclusion

There is no one particular system that is broken. In fact, the system is doing exactly as it has been designed. Sadly, for the thousands of people who find themselves trapped within this system, they are fighting against a force that has been designed to work against them. Regardless of their outcomes, they quickly learn that some traumas never go away.

Basic Level, children, CPS, Gold Membership, Law Enforcement, Media, Opinions, Police, police relations, Politics, predatory, terrorism, Uncategorized

The CPS/DFS statistics game.

It’s something we hear about more often than we should. It starts with an allegation, leads into an investigation, and often times ends with the family fighting for their future. This is the world of the family court system, their…

To view this article, please join our subscription program. You can join the free subscription and gain access to this content! What have you got to lose? It's absolutely free to you. Alternatively, you can join our paid subscription program and help the platform in the spread of information.

Business relations, Consumer Reports, Consumer reports, Free Article, Law Enforcement, Media, Opinions, Police, police relations, predatory, scam, Uncategorized

is Abuelita’s stealing from its customers?

The last thing you expect, when eating out, is discovering that a restaurant has taken out more than what you expected. When the bill should total around $30, it can be a rather nasty surprise to see that nearly $70 had been taken out of your bank account. For an elderly Shawnee, OK couple, this is exactly what happened.

The elderly couple decided to treat themselves to Abuelita’s, located just off of US-177. For them, everything appeared to be normal, that was until they got the receipt. A bill that should have been roughly $30.00, ended up draining their bank account.

Upon seeing the amount, they learned that they had actually been charged nearly double what they should have been (image below.) Upon reviewing their bank account, they found that the establishment took out $69.10 for a meal that should had only cost around $30.00. At this point, they contacted the restaurant. Upon bringing up the fraudulent charge, the woman on the phone, who had been their cashier, suddenly was unable to hear them. She proceeded to put somebody else on the phone and, just as before, he abruptly became deaf as soon as the concerns were brought up. At this point, it was clear to the customers that this was a deliberate theft.

Merchant copy of the receipt, which conflicts with the customer’s copy.

With no alternative options, the defrauded customers returned to the restaurant and confronted them in person. It was at this point that they “returned” the funds, giving the customers the above copy of the receipt. However, this too would be proven false. In actuality, the charge still went through and the bank had received no indication that the bill had been reversed. The reason? Because the above voided charge, never left the restaurant’s register.

Bank charges, showing the bill was eventually reversed.

At this point, the customer’s were more than willing to bring law enforcement into the situation. They again, contacted Abuelita’s in attempt to get the unauthorized portion of the bill refunded. This time, however, they informed the employees that if it was not returned, charges would be filed. Only then did the establishment refund the additional $40.02 charge. However, they had also refunded the actual price of the meal.

While this situation did work out for this elderly couple, there is still a lingering question: how many other customers have they done this to, who didn’t notice the extra charge? More importantly, how long have they been conducting themselves in this form of theft? War on Corruption, LLC., reached out the restaurant, but have yet to receive a response. Should that change, we will add it to this article.

Law Enforcement, Media, Police, police relations, shooting, terrorism, Uncategorized

Ft. Worth Officer: A history of corruption

Across the country, police have been getting slammed for various forms of corruption. Unfortunately, this article is going to be among that trend. Today, we are going to be discussing Fort Worth police officer, Taylor Stephens, a woman who not only appears to be vile, but has absolutely no regard for Constitutional rights, as viewed in multiple YouTube videos (links below.)

In a perfect world, officers such as this one, would be held to a higher standard of accountability. If an officer is shown to be corrupt, they are removed. However, all to often, this is not the case. Stephens has a notorious history within law enforcement. In 2018, in fact, she was terminated from the Fort Worth police department due to a man dying while in her custody; years later, for unknown reasons, this infamous officer was given back her job.

July 2018 Death

In 2018, five officers were involved with the arrest of Christopher Lowe, 55. Among them was none other than Taylor Stephens. While detained in the back of a patrol vehicle, Lowe kept advising the officers that he was having medical complications. One such complication being that he could not breath. It is important to note that within law enforcement there is a common expression: If they can talk, they can breath. However, this is not always true.

The interaction with Lowe was based on complaints that he had attempted to break into a residential home, a crime that was hardly worth dying for. regardless, as he desperately tried to get officers to take his complaints seriously, they simply ignored him. The officers made the presumption that he was just making up the medical situation in an attempt to avoid jail. As his situation continued to deteriorate, officers finally began to take notice.

It was at this point that they removed the cuffs and attempted CPR as they awaited EMS. As they discussed the situation with each other, they willfully planned to leave out details regarding their suspicions that he was under the influence of Narcotics. This omission of information very well could have sealed Lowe’s fate. The officers involved, which again included Taylor Stephens, were either suspended or terminated; she would be among the officers terminated. Although she no longer on the force, as a result of this case, that would not last. Since her return, she has terrorized the citizens of Fort Worth.

Time Post Reinstatement

Officer Stephens has shown no regard for her own department’s policies, nor has she shown regard for the very Constitutional rights that she was sworn to protect. According to one source, they are currently undergoing legal processes simply for recording the officer, who was acting within the scopes of her duties. The source, via email exchange, had the following statement:

I appreciate you helping to shine light on her, she charged me with felony stalking for recording her on a public sidewalk.

As many of us know, it is not a crime to film an officer in the scope of their duties. It is also not a crime to film a person in a public location as there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. However, according to the source, Stephens has taken this Constitutionally protected act to an entirely new level of extreme. With hope, we will be able to cover more on this subject at a later time as it is a currently pending case.

In video, we have seen her disregard for department policies. Virtually every department has a tobacco policy. To sum this up, it typically says something along the lines of, “The use of tobacco products, including vapors, is strictly prohibited while on duty.” Stephens, however, is clearly observed spitting chewed tobacco onto the pavement as she walks back to her patrol car. In the video, which is linked here, she is first observed using tobacco around the 1:20 mark. Later, in her patrol car, she is observed using it again starting at the 14:55 mark. Regardless of this clear violation of policy, no consequences have been issued to the officer. Because of this, we are left to question the integrity of her department as a whole.

With that question in mind, we looked into that very question. What we found can only be described as horrifying. Report after report of excessive force, wrongful deaths, and various other violations appear to be common practice within the Ft. Worth Police department. We’ll link a few videos below. With this information, it is of no surprise that Officer Stephens was reinstated. What is surprising is the fact that this abuse has been allowed to continue for as long as it has.

Situations like this only serve to make the overall law enforcement community look bad. While we are highlighting the darker side of the system, we are not oblivious to those who serve for legitimate reasons. Regardless of the career, there will always be those who abuse their authority. It is those individuals that we, as a society, should hold accountable.

links

Officer Taylor Stephens

Officer Taylor Stephens involved shooting

Ft. Worth Police kill man over Fireworks

Free Article, Law Enforcement, Media, Opinions, Police, police relations, Politics, predatory, scam, Uncategorized

Daniel Holtzclaw: Did the system really fail?

Disclaimer:

We, at War on Corruption, LLC. are not saying that Daniel Holtzclaw is innocent, we are fully aware that he violated multiple policies which ultimately assisted in his downfall. In this article, we are merely discussing the topics that have led to debate. While we do acknowledge that there are many more questions surrounding his case, it is a very complex situation and would require multiple articles to fully address. Therefore, we are simply opening a door for discussion. At the end of this article, we have added additional links of information. These are so that any person interested may conduct their research and come to their own conclusion regarding the case. The article does not cover everything. This is due to the complexity of the case; it simply would require multiple articles to address the case in full.

Introduction

The case of Daniel Holtzclaw, a former Oklahoma City Police Officer, has always been shrouded with debate. Starting with the questionable tactics used by the investigators, questionable witnesses, and even the evidence itself, there has always been scrutiny. For years, we have sat on this story, unsure as to rather or not it was one that should be written. It is very complicated, it may potentially open old wounds, or it simply may expose just how corrupt our justice system actually is. Either way, we’ve finally decided that it was time to write the article that will, without doubt, be our most controversial one. We’re going to discuss the Daniel Holtzclaw case and the problems within it.

Where it all began

Rather or not Holtzclaw sexually assaulted multiple women remains heavily debated. What isn’t debated, however, is the fact that he did initiate traffic stops to which he failed to report. While this alone does not prove guilt, it is a clear violation of protocol. Regardless of this violation, it was learned that Holtzclaw had initiated stops in, such as this, before.

Originally, he was faced with a total of 36 sexual based crimes. Among these were rape, sexual battery, forcible oral sodomy, and the list goes on. Out of the 36, Holtzclaw would be convicted of 18. With this conviction, began a very heated debate. This is a debate that is still ongoing. The only question to ask is why are people debating his guilt?

Originally, Holtzclaw was charged with more than 30 counts of sexually based crimes. However, by the end of his trial, only 18 would land convictions. Why is that? The simple answer is due to the lack of evidence and credibility issues with the alleged victims. That leads us to ask the most obvious question, “who are these victims?”

The Victims

The women who made accusations against Holtzclaw had a few key similarities with one another. To start, they were all lower class, they were all Black, had interactions with Holtzclaw, and criminal backgrounds. While this has shed light into their credibility, this isn’t the main discussion when it comes to his victims. The discussion is rather or not Holtzclaw did anything at all. According to one victim, Tabitha Barnes, he apparently never lay a hand on her, though she had testified differently.

During the trial, Barnes had testified that Holtzclaw had inappropriately touched her breasts. Ultimately, her testimony was among the charges to which Holtzclaw was found guilty. But there’s a problem with her accusation, an issue that would come much later. As though having a change of heart matters, Barnes has done a complete 180 on her original testimony, now stating that he never did anything to her. In simple terms, she sat in a courtroom, under oath, and fabricated a story that got the former officer convicted. For this, you don’t need to take our word for it, you can watch the video for yourself, we’ve included it below.

While Barnes ultimately recanted her story, she was not alone in having a retraction in statement. Sherry Ellis Smith would later admit to never seeing Holtzclaw prior to the trial. In total, Daniel would be accused of more than thirty sexually based crimes, but only convicted of eighteen, giving him a grand total of 263 years in prison. We can go on and on about this subject, but the article isn’t about the victims. Ultimately, the question is, could Daniel have been innocent of the crimes?

The original accuser, 57 Y.O. Jenny Wiggins, the woman who initially triggered the investigation, has also been a focal point of debate. Prior to her being pulled over, it was discovered that her license had actually been suspended for around thirty years, she had also admitted to using the controlled substance, Cannabis shortly before the encounter. Furthermore, there would be no evidence on this victim linking her to Holtzclaw. The only link is in the interaction, to which he was in policy violation by conducting. The violation being that he failed to notify dispatch and disabling the car’s computer.

During the encounter with Holtzclaw, Wiggins claimed that he had her place her hands on the hood of his patrol car. However, there was no evidence on his car that supported this claim. The investigators explanation for this lack of evidence? The car was full of trash and therefore finding a fingerprint on the outside would be impossible. This is alarming because most of us know that the inside of a vehicle does not affect the outside. With that in mind, we have to ponder on how they were unable to find a simple fingerprint. Beyond this, we cannot ignore the fact that Wiggins actually had changed her story several times. In fact, the description she had given of Holtzclaw was completely off. She described him as having blonde hair and being several inches shorter than what he actually is. It’s important to note that Holtzclaw stands at just over six feet, a hard to miss feature. But this isn’t the only issue within the case. We will link a video that further discusses this in the links below.

The Evidence

Looking at the evidence used, at best, it wasn’t the greatest. In other words, it left a lot of room for debate, and it has. Aside the accusers, many whom had been discredited, and the later retraction, there was nothing that we could100% state tied Holtzclaw to anything criminal. The only thing we can say concretely is this: he broke policy by turning off the computer system in his patrol car, but that doesn’t mean he committed a crime.

The trial was a very heated and emotionally charged one, this was clear to anybody who followed it. Being charged for multiple crimes, primarily on no evidence aside from verbal statements, is absolutely terrifying, but it demonstrates a phrase that we have stated multiple times before: “Sex based crimes are the easiest to charge because they do not require evidence.” Did they have any evidence aside from verbal statements? They had one thing: one sample of DNA belonging to a 17 Y.O. girl, as well as an unknown male. Regardless of its location, this DNA is up for debate.

Under normal circumstances, DNA is a fairly reliable source of forensics. It’s so reliable that it’s used in virtually every criminal case. For the Holtzclaw case, however, it’s been one of many targets for debate. The DNA was located on the outside of the former officer’s pants, near the zipper. For some, this is concrete enough to suggest his guilt. But is it? Well, no. While we wish it were that simple, it’s not. If the officer had any form of contact with the girl, regardless of it being sexual or not, it’s very plausible that this DNA, being skin cells, would have gotten onto the former officer, including his hands. If he had done something as simple as using the restroom, that alone would explain why they were in the location that they were.

What we couldn’t find, when looking at this particular form of evidence, was anything implicating that semen was located in the area. The fact of the matter is, if he had committed such an act, this would had most likely been present. If not, at minimum, pre-ejaculatory fluid, and yet we have found nothing implicating its presence, an abnormality in that he allegedly committed more than one crime while wearing them, and yet that florfenicol evidence was not present.

Regardless of all of the issues, we do know that Holtzclaw was trying to get close to some of the women he had contact with, however unprofessional that might be, it doesn’t necessarily mean he was trying to force anybody into such contacts with him. During his career, he had a couple of major issues involving Facebook messages and visiting a residence of a woman to which he had contact with while on duty. While this isn’t conclusive evidence to support he did anything illegal, it ultimately did come back to bite him at the worst possible time. Again, while the DNA is questionable, as mentioned, we can’t ignore that it was there and where it was located. For this, we would call that a double-edged sword; it doesn’t prove guilt, doesn’t prove innocence, but really looks bad for him.

Conclusion

While we cannot say with 100% certainty that he is guilty, we can’t say that he’s completely innocent, either. Holtzclaw violated policy, he was looking for intimate interactions, he had attempted romantic relations with some of the women he interacted with and appeared to act impulsively. His actions, especially in disabling the computer, does leave the possibility that he may have committed crimes, but it’s not absolute. Ultimately, his case was reckless and poorly constructed, at best. In many ways, the case appeared to an attempt to disarm any potential civil unrest rather than the actual seek for justice. The victims are questionable, with criminal histories, and potential motive for wanting to ruin an officer’s life. Of course, this is just mere observation, one that is heavily debated.

Links

The following links are for informational purposes only. The links are not representative of the platform’s views or opinions of the case.

The fight for release

https://chng.it/qpWfRyhwZN

Daniel Holtzclaw | Wrongfully Convicted Officer | UNCUFF (uncufftheinnocent.org)

Daniel Holtzclaw Case Analysis | Investigators Restore Memories of Victims Who Forgot Cop’s Crimes – YouTube

Articles related to the case

How does INTERROGATION Work? Serial Offender – Daniel Holtzclaw – YouTube

Trial for former Oklahoma police officer accused of rape begins | Reuters

HOLTZCLAW v. STATE (okcca.net)

The UnTold Story — HoltzclawTrial.com

OSCN Case Details

Ep18: Lots Of Liars — HoltzclawTrial.com

Amanda Knox: “How Could He Be Innocent?”: The Case of Daniel Holtzclaw | Crime Story

Former OKC police officer Daniel Holtzclaw sentenced to 263 years in prison (koco.com)

How the Daniel Holtzclaw Jury Decided to Send the Ex-Oklahoma City Police Officer to Prison for 263 Years – ABC News (go.com)

Family claims there’s proof victim of former Oklahoma City officer Daniel Holtzclaw recanted (kfor.com)

children, Free Article, Law Enforcement, Media, Police, police relations, predatory, Uncategorized

Berwick PA man accused of sexually assaulting a minor

Recently, a disturbing case was brought to us by an anonymous contact. Because of the nature of the accusation, we have decided to push this article forward. 23-year-old, Nathain Ryan Hisey, of Berwick PA, is accused of sexually assaulting a 6-year-old child. According to the child, whose name has been withheld due to her age, the incident occurred at Hisey’s home. So, what exactly happened on that day? That’s exactly what we’re about to dive into.

On December 7,2021 the child had gone over to Hisey’s home for a play date. According to the child, she had gone into the restroom to wash her hands when Hisey, a father of two, soon to be three, followed her and asked if she needed help. It was, at this point, the predator made his move. According to the victim, she was instructed to close her eyes and open her mouth. Upon doing so, she states that he placed something into it.

On the drive home, Hisey made yet another attempt to assault the young child. Unlike the first time, the girl refused to comply. She was then instructed to tell nobody about the assault. Upon arriving home, the mother noted that the girl was in a clear state of distraught, reportedly crying. The girl proceeded to inform the mother of what had happened while at the Hisey residence. The girl explained that she could hear him unzip his pants. The “object” he inserted was described as “soft and round, like a hotdog. She further elaborated by describing the object as “hairy but not cold.”

We asked an individual, who was before the accusation, friends with Hisey, if he was at all surprised by the accusation. In his response, he stated, “I am, but only to an extent. Nate is a well-known dishonest person – it’s practically in his DNA. He’s done a lot of dishonest things that put the average person to task. On the other hand, I wouldn’t have thought he’d touch a child.”

We then proceeded to ask the individual about how his other friends have taken the accusation, presuming he knew. He replied saying, “Well, so far I think it’s a mix. They’re looking at it with an “innocent until proven guilty” perspective, which I understand. Meanwhile, there’s one other aside from me who believe he’s guilty.”

Finally, we asked if the fact that the accusation is coming from the child have any effect on his perception of this situation. To that question, he stated, “Well, from what I’ve seen, the victim’s story hasn’t changed an inch. The story we were given by the perpetrator was somewhat altered – which makes me look at both him and his spouse in a bad light. So, it’s worse in my eyes than others. I also come from a biased source, being an abuse survivor myself. I try not to let that factor into things, but there’s too many holes in the story I was given before I saw the article.”

Currently, Hisey is facing two charges: rape of a child and Invol. Deviate Sexual Intercourse W/Child. Both of these are Class 1 (or class A for some other states,) felonies. If convicted, he could face the potential of being imprisoned for approximately sixty years. This is, of course, presuming that no other additional charges are added onto the current ones.

Hisey denies that the event occurred. In his account, he admits to instructing the victim to close her eyes and open her mouth. However, he states that what he gave her was nothing more than a “Nutrigrain bar. Currently, Hisey is not incarcerated, being permitted to walk the streets. Though his current location is unknown, we can’t rule out the possibility that he has returned to his home, which have children present. Below is the current docket.

MdjDocketSheet

Free Article, Law Enforcement, Media, Opinions, Police, police relations, Politics, shooting, terrorism, Uncategorized

Uvalde Police: A review into their lack of action

The horrific shooting, which occurred in Uvalde Texas, has been discussed on multiple platforms. The shooting occurred when an 18 y.o. coward, Salvador Ramos, proceeded to walk into the Robb Elementary school and began to open fire on both, children and teachers. While this was a horrific event that has devastated many families, this isn’t our focal point. Instead, we are focusing on the police department and how they (didn’t) respond.

It’s standard that officers are trained for deadly situations, this includes mass shootings. In fact, law enforcement agencies run drills for such events. With that in mind, it leads to one question: Why did it take the Uvalde police 77 minutes to stop the shooter? For this, we’re going to have to review the timeline of events. In doing so, we can make a determination of exactly how long it took the Uvalde police to actually respond.

While we can say that this event took place very recently, the shooting was actually planned long before it occurred. In September of 2021, we know that the shooter requested his sister to purchase him a weapon. The reason for this is because, according to Federal law, you must be 18 years of age to buy a rifle. However, you must be 21 years of age to buy a pistol. Thankfully, in this situation, his sister declined his request.

At around March 1-3, 2022, images of weapons would be posted to the shooter’s Instagram account. On one such post, the shooter states the following, “10 more days.” To this, a user, ironically enough, asked about rather or not he had plans of shooting up a school. Around two months later, he would purchase weapons for the shooting.

The shooter’s final day

At roughly 11:00 AM, Ramos sent a Facebook message. This message was directed to a German girl that he had met online. In this message, he states that he planned to shoot his grandmother in the face. He than proceeded to carry out the act, however she called law enforcement. He than proceeds to steal her car and crashes it near Robb Elementary, the final phase of his diabolical plan.

We know that he arrived at the school at 11:28. two minutes later, a teacher made a call to 9-1-1, informing them of the urgent situation. As Ramos proceeded to the building, he had already begun to fire rounds. He entered the building at 11:33, where he would roam around the building with the intent of taking as many lives as he possibly could.

The critical time in this sequence is 11:35. This is the time police arrived on scene. Although they proceeded to the door, previously used by Ramos, it was found to be closed. This meant the police could not enter the building. Presumably through another door, the police proceed to enter. Upon doing so, they are met with gunfire which results in grazing wounds.

Now, to explain what a grazing wound is. In short, it means that the officers were hit, but it barely went into them. Basically, it’s a very minor wound. Regardless of the fact that they outnumbered the shooter, the proceed to evacuate the school, leaving the shooter to take more lives. Within minutes, 16 additional rounds are heard from within the building. At 11:43, in what can only be an amazing display of incompetence, the Uvalde Police take to Facebook, posting that the school is under lockdown due to a shooter. They go onto to say the following, “The students and staff are safe in the building.” Since this time, the post itself was deleted but how could they have posted something so blatantly untrue?

At 11:43, the police again post to Facebook. In this post they claim to have the shooter in custody. If you have been following this case, you already know that this information is untrue, the shooter was actually fatally shot by a lone border patrol agent. While this information may seem minor, it’s important to note one major problem: Ramos was still very much alive and he was still firing his weapons inside the school.

It would be at 12:50 PM, around 77 minutes after the shooting began, that a border patrol agent, who refused to wait for backup, entered the school. This one brave man ultimately did what the Uvalde police were to incompetent to do: he eliminated the threat. How could the police have gotten so much of this wrong? Now, it’s time we review that.

What went wrong?

From reviewing the timeline of events, it is very clear that the Uvalde police were incompetent. But why? As I mentioned, law enforcement agencies typically train for this sort of event. Based on the fact that they were so quick to flee the building and stand around, it’s clear that this department on how to handle this situation. For that, I don’t blame the officers personally. To simply state this, they have no control over the training procedures. The blame in this instance would go toward the local government and the police chief. These individuals are tasked with ensuring that their officers are capable of handling events such as this.

Moving beyond that, we can hold the officers responsible for their abrupt evacuation of the building. Because of this choice, many more lives were needlessly taken. While I can understand the concept of fear, it is also important to recognize that these are men and women who signed up to run into danger, not away from it. While they stood outside, as we’ve seen, they proceeded to provide false information to the public. Stating that the individual was in custody, long before his life would be ended, is appalling! Not only did the combination of these two things make the department look bad, but it has also created a massive backlash on social media, more on that shortly.

Shortly after the threat was eliminated, the police would again state that he was in custody. Now, I don’t think I need to state the obvious, but I will. There is a fundamental difference in being fatally shot and being in custody. How so? One infers that the offender is still alive while the other one is rather obvious. By stating that he was in custody, they provided more false information in that they gave the perception that Ramos was still breathing. Now, let’s go into that social media backlash.

As a result of the horrific mishandling of this situation, the department’s Facebook page has been met with heavy critique. Reviews that slam the department’s incompetence are very common. To quote one such review, “great place to shoot kids. All the cops are cowards. 0/10 would defund.” This, and many other reviews, demonstrate just how the public feels about this department. However, the department had demonstrated exactly why the “anti-police” movement has gone into full throttle. People have every right to be upset at this department, and they absolutely should be. What this department did was unethical, and as a result of the department’s choices, many more lives were taken.

It’s clear that this law enforcement department has some serious integrity problems. It’s also clear that their training is in desperate need of an overhaul. Though they will continue to get backlash, for sometime, we do hope that they take this opportunity to review their policies and procedures. Even with much needed changes, it will not undo the events of that day. To those families, we can only offer our deepest condolences.

If you like what we do, please consider subscribing. This can be done via PayPal or Patreon, it’s as easy as clicking a button. You would not only help us continue our work, you would also help in maintaining the site. So, let’s make a difference and let’s fight the good fight together!

Business relations, Consumer Reports, Free Article, Law Enforcement, Media, Opinions, Police, police relations, Politics, predatory

OCJDC article Follow-up (Evidence gallery)

On Facebook, our platform received a message from an individual claiming to be associated with the agency, to which we previously wrote about. If you haven’t read that article, we’ll give you a quick recap into the tragic events that unfolded for a mentally disabled individual. Bear in mind, that we have learned additional details since the previous article, they will be included in this one.

To summarize the situation, a detention officer with autism was placed onto the overnight shift. Initially, he felt that it would be more suited for him, he could get better adjusted, and so on. Immediately following this switch, a night supervisor appeared to make him a target. According to the individual, she would berate him in front of the residents (children who are in Juvenile custody,) as well as in front of other officers. Eventually, due to the hostile work environment, created by his supervisor, he began reaching out to individuals who outranked her. Below are the emails, that apparently don’t exist, if we were to listen to an alleged employee of this detention center.

Though redacted from the above image, the unedited version shows that this email was sent to a Major (yes they apparently use military rankings.) We asked about the response email to which we have been informed that one was never given, as far as he knew, it had been ignored. This leads us to email number two.

Upon not receiving any form of feedback, he proceeded to go up the ranking system. The above email was sent to the detention center chief, whom we mentioned in the previous article. Again, there was no response. He presumed that it was ignored for a second time. With that, he went outside of their ranking system.

On 4-26-2022, he proceeded to send this email to the HR manager. The date is important to mention, as it plays a critical role into a potentially illegal termination. Though there was no immediate response, on 5-1-2022, he had gotten a phone call from the detention center chief. The Chief requested a meeting between him, HR, and the employee. Here’s what we now know took place during this meeting.

Initially, they discussed his concerns and problems. However, near the end of this discussion, they took an abrupt change. According to the former employee, they proceeded to gaslight him, asking him if he may had done something that would have warranted the treatment he had received. Now, we as a platform, wish to go on record and say this: “THIS IS NOT OKAY! ABUSE IS NEVER ACCEPTABLE REGARDLESS OF WHY IT HAD TAKEN PLACE!”

From this point, he learned that an officer filed a complaint against him. The reason? He made her uncomfortable. Alright, so we’re going to interject right here. If you know an individual with autism, then you already know how difficult social situations can be. In other words, it’s not surprising that he would make somebody uncomfortable. What is shocking is the fact that she, right after he began sending emails off, felt the need to report him. We can speculate as to why. However, we’ll refrain from doing so.

So, as we stated, this horrible excuse of a meeting had taken place on 5-1-2022. Again, this date is important. By the time this meeting even took place, the former employee informs us that he had placed an application with the county jail. He informs us that this was done due to the lack of response from those to whom he sent emails. In short, he felt as though he had no support.

It’s important that we mention that apparently all county-based agencies utilize the same emailing system. This, as with the dates, is also important to note as you are about to learn.

On 5-5-2022, the former employee received this email via his county inbox; it came from the county jail. Now, if you read the previous article, 5-5-2022 is a very critical date. Within three hours of seeing this email, the detention chief pulled this man from his post, escorted him out of the facility, and terminated his employment as they stood in a parking lot. Yes, you read that correctly. The man couldn’t even give the former employee the respect of terminating him in his office; he had to walk him outside, in public. Furthermore, according to the employee, the weather wasn’t exactly sunny, as it had been raining for most of that day.

While their employees may claim that these emails do not exist, we do have the unedited versions of these. We know the names of who received them, we know the email addresses to which they were sent. This timeline, in our opinion, shows a clear indication that a man was purposefully targeted by his supervisor. When he attempted to report it, he was purposefully ignored until he proceeded with placing job applications. At this point, they did a gaslighting, under the guise of a meeting. They not only justified the abuse he was alleging, but they also went as far as to target a social issue that directly stemmed from his condition. Finally, when another agency contacted him, in retaliation OCJDC terminated him on the spot.

The termination not only makes it look bad for this man, who may now fail at obtaining this potential job, it was also illegal. In the United States, there are retaliation laws. Even if the State is a “Right to work,” or “At will” State, they can only fire you for legal reasons, a classification that retaliation does not fall into. Given the above timeline, the dates that we’ve seen on the emails, and the fact he did lose his job, retaliation does appear to be the reason for the end result. We are assisting him in acquiring an attorney. This form of injustice simply cannot be allowed to stand.