Category Archives: Media

Arkansas company owner bullies mentally challenged employee (autistic man shares his story with us)

UPDATE:

In the short time since this article has been released, the company, to which we wrote about, has become aware. According to the individual, who initially reached out for help, they are demanding that he remove all the “slander.” We spoke to a well known advocate. At the time that most of the events unfolded, he had apparantly reached out to her for help. During this time, she confirmed that the owner, who’s name is now known, called the former employee a “stupid fat ass.”

Though we did reach out, via Google review, we have yet to get a response from the company owner. Given his rather questionable statement to us (photo below article,) we have more than enough evidence to believe that he is, in fact, a bully. With that, this article will NOT come down.

Editor’s notation: regardless of the implied threat (photograph below,) the business owner has no legal grounds to authorize any videos or photographs posted to this site. If you don’t like the fame, don’t target disabled people, mate.

Workplace bullying is not new. In fact, it’s a rather large problem. As with any form of trash, we happily attack this problem. About an hour ago, our team obtained a video. While the video was clearly a mobile device in a pocket, the audio was what caught our attention. The video cannot be posted at this time as the individual has expressed a desire to take the situation to court.

The situation apparantly began early in the morning, when the mentally challenged (who requested to remain anonymous) was awaken to a knock. He was told that he would be relocated to another vehicle. He explained to us that he was upset as it was the fourth time within three weeks that he was forced to move. However, what ensued can only be described as horrid. The audio, according to the former employee, is the owner of Karr Transportation (KTTI.) Shortly after the audio begins, the owner is heard saying, “I have delt with stupid motherfuckers like you in the past…” The audio becomes fuzzy after this point.

Within the audio multiple insults are thrown at the employee. “Stupid fat mother fucker,” “stupid fat fuck,” and the list continues. Now, what makes this situation particulary horrible is the fact the employee suffers from Asperger’s syndrome, a form of autism, the owner of the company was apparantly made aware of this during the assault. “I don’t give a fuck what you are,” was allegedly his response.

Allegedly, the employee attempted to go into the workplace, as the company left him stranded 300+ miles from home. At this point, the owner began a second round of assaults. However, according to the former employee, there was a moment to which the owner walked up to him in a threatning manner. The employee, fearing for his safety, stood up to the would-be bully. At this point, the verbal assault continued, for the second time.

Not only is this bullying, this falls into so many legal grounds. We looked up the company, left a review in attempt to make contact with the owner. The response he gave simply placed blame on the former employee. In retrospect, insulting employees with disabilities is acceptable work ethic. We looked at his various replies to other reviews and found a theme of sarcasm and lack of empathy.

Bullying of a handicapped person is not just unethical, it’s an outrage. Handicapped people, for some, are seen as weak and vulnerable; clearly that is the case with his former employer. However, this handicapped person knew of our platform, took the chance to contact us, and now we have relayed his story. If you are being bullied, we can be your voice as well.

The response from the owner is rather interesting. An implied threat, perhaps?
Advertisements

Super “Starr”

When we released the article on Francesca Amato, it was only logical that we would, in time, write this article. Looking into the self proclaimed “advocate,” Jamie “Starr” Johnson. While Jamie isn’t as popular as some of the others, she is equally, if not more, diabolical than the Fran club.

Jamie, while it isn’t confirmed to us, appears to have gotten her name known through a specific case. The mother, Nikki (lastname omitted) had a child who was hospitalized. We are going to spare the details as that isn’t prudent for this article. We may cover that at a later time, only with the mother’s consent. To make a long story short, while the child was dying in the hospital, Jamie made multiple videos to which she exploited the situation. Bear in mind, that nobody related to the child had knowledge of this until much later.

In time, the child did pass. Jamie retreated to the hospital grounds, just outside the hospital. Again, without the family’s knowledge or permission, a livestream was made. During the video, Jamie, without consent, had announced the untimely death. Naturally, this created a rather large rift between Nikki and herself. The exploitation didn’t end there, however. While the mother begged her former “advocate” friend to cease, Jamie continued to exploit the death, all while Nikki publically demanded that she stop. From this point forward, Jamie’s shattered legacy spirals downward.

Contraversy involving the self proclaimed advocate doesn’t end there, however. Recently, there have been several images discovered pertaining to the “super starr.” While taking seductive images is not a crime, it has many people asking, “should a family adcocate act in this manner?” The answer is simply, “NO.” When proclaiming to be a family/child advocate, there are certain expectations that one must uphold. For example, an off duty officer posts racially driven statements, they are suspended. While Jamie defends the images, it has risen much concern regarding her advocasy. However, we will let the evidence speak for itself. At the end of this article, we have attached some of the images.

Jamie has caught even more attention. In a recent livestream, in which Rudy Orr and Randy Davis seem to make amends, Jamie went on the offensive. Among words of encouragement, Jamie began a vicious attack against Mr. Davis. During this assault, one of our own began to challenge her. He asked, on several occasions, for evidence to support her claims. Among her claims were: stalking, harassment, and slander. As of the time we wrote this article, Jamie has still failed to provide any evidence.

Following the assault, Randy and Rudy conducted another livestream, openly inviting Jamie to partake. They are heard repeatedly questioning rather or not Jamie would appear to present her evidence. Jamie did not. In fact, while they were doing the livestream, she had apparantly been commenting in the initial post, containing her assault. As far as we can tell, she has no evidence to present and thus avoided any subject to which she is called out.

If this is what an advocate is, I truly feel for any family who are desperate. Before choosing an advocate, look into them. It is strongly suggested that you not only check into them criminally, but morally, afterall it’s your children who depend on you to make the correct choices. We are going to assist in the moral department. Here is your potential advocate.

Facebook Wars: The attack on Freedom

Sometime ago, we wrote another article pertaining to Facebook and it’s apparent war on media. To some regard, this is a bit of a follow-up article to that. Since the time of our previous article, Facebook has not only continued it’s unjust attack against independent media platforms, it appears to have increased the attack. The most common reason given for any platform being removed, “X post has violated our Community Standards.” So, seeing that posted by so many, we decided to take a look at their community standards. What we ultimately found, was a policy purposefully written to be extremely vague. Even with the vague writings, it remained obvious that Facebook, was in fact, in violation of their own policy. This article is going to break the policies, to which we believe are being implicated, down for everybody.

Community Standards: Section III Part 11: Hate Speech.

Below are a couple of paragraphs from the “Hate Speech” section of their Community Standards. For those of us, who have been on Facebook for awhile now, we have seen this policy broken by the Social Media giant countless times. How? Let’s review it:

We define hate speech as a direct attack on people based on what we call protected characteristics — race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, caste, sex, gender, gender identity, and serious disease or disability. We also provide some protections for immigration status. We define attack as violent or dehumanizing speech, statements of inferiority, or calls for exclusion or segregation. We separate attacks into three tiers of severity, as described below.

Sometimes people share content containing someone else’s hate speech for the purpose of raising awareness or educating others. In some cases, words or terms that might otherwise violate our standards are used self-referentially or in an empowering way. People sometimes express contempt in the context of a romantic break-up. Other times, they use gender-exclusive language to control membership in a health or positive support group, such as a breastfeeding group for women only. In all of these cases, we allow the content but expect people to clearly indicate their intent, which helps us better understand why they shared it. Where the intention is unclear, we may remove the content.”

In the past, we have seen cases to which Facebook removed hate speech. However, we have also seen them outright ignore it. The first paragraph is very important in that it informs you as to what they define as hate speech. The contradiction, however, comes within the second paragraph; specifically, these sentences:

People sometimes express contempt in the context of a romantic break-up. Other times, they use gender-exclusive language to control membership in a health or positive support group, such as a breastfeeding group for women only. In all of these cases, we allow the content but expect people to clearly indicate their intent, which helps us better understand why they shared it.”

Now, if you’re like me, chances are you have shared something along these lines; you shared something to bring awareness to the initial form of hate speech. In the case of me doing it, for example, Facebook banned my account for 30 days while leaving the post I was exposing up. In fact, according to Facebook, the original post was not in violation.

But the bulls-eye on the independent journalist doesn’t end there. Another area, to which Facebook has targeted journalists is:

Part IV: Integrity and Authenticity: Section 16: Spam

We work hard to limit the spread of commercial spam to prevent false advertising, fraud, and security breaches, all of which detract from people’s ability to share and connect. We do not allow people to use misleading or inaccurate information to collect likes, followers, or shares.”

This policy, as a whole, is highly questionable. Not only is it extremely vague, it leaves to many doors open, one door is a rather new policy of theirs, however we will get into that later. This policy has literally made it so that it’s up for interpretation as to what “spam” is. You get a media platform, for example, that posts often on a specific arena, Facebook could potentially remove that platform utilizing the claim that they are “spamming” the site. In fact, they could go as far as to state they are spamming the site with “hate speech.” this one paragraph has, in the past, raised questions. And seeing that this is all Facebook has written within this section, it’s obvious as to why.

While section 17 is also one for concern, let’s skip to the section that is really important within Part IV.

Section 18: Fake News

Reducing the spread of false news on Facebook is a responsibility that we take seriously. We also recognize that this is a challenging and sensitive issue. We want to help people stay informed without stifling productive public discourse. There is also a fine line between false news and satire or opinion. For these reasons, we don’t remove false news from Facebook but instead, significantly reduce its distribution by showing it lower in the News Feed.”

Now this policy has, to some regard, affected War on Corruption. The problem here lies beyond what Facebook is claiming, this one goes into “Freedom of Speech” and “censorship.” the problem with this policy, like so many, is it’s extremely vague. Furthermore, this policy raises many questions regarding Facebook’s stance on constitutional rights and liberties. According to Facebook, they wish to maintain a “safe environment.” However, it seems they also wish to silence any platform that attempts to conduct legitimate journalism. Because of how this policy is written, it can essentially be translated to say, “We, at Facebook, intend to impede any media platform that politically opposes our ideology.” At least this wording is more accurate.

Facebook literally has a novel sized section of policies. Like the above mentioned, most of their policies are extremely vague and left for individual interpretation. One thing that is not vague, however, is how Facebook utilizes the vagueness of these policies. Due to the way they are written, it has given Facebook a back-door into enforcing them when, and how, they see fit. Because of this, multiple platforms within the past year have suffered; the most recent platform within the long list, “The Daily Haze” (TDH.) It is apparent that Facebook conducts a malicious form of censorship, silencing anybody who opposes them. The solution? The only solution is to simply find another Social media site.

(Discreditation) Victim or guilty?

About a month or so ago, I recieved a screenshot. In the photo, it had a phone number of a woman who wanted to get into contact. Today, without reason, she attacked the guy who was looking into her case. Her friends have now come to our Facebook page to continue the assault. This is our response to her friends, who insist on bringing their fight to WoC.

About a month or so, as stated, either this individual, or our team, made contact. Her friend, who attempted to start a fight on our Facebook, claims she did not want our “opinion” regarding her case.

As you can clearly see, that is not the case. Not only did she give a contact number (omitted for privacy,) she even encouraged contact. We had intended to do this. However, we were still digging around into her case. We wanted to at least have some information prior to contact.

In one image, she claims to have no idea who our guy is, muchless how he got onto her friends list. We have already proven this to be a lie. Her behavior, being unprovoked however, has me questioning her CPS case. I have seen many “innocent” people, later proven guilty, act just like this. While being under stress is common with a CPS case, it also has an odd way of showing a persons’ true colors.

Diegal case: new information

As are most people, we have been following the Melissa Diegel case. Melissa Diegel, for the past five years, was known for uploading livestream videos regarding her CPS case, a case she apparantly lost years ago. Recently, Diegel was charged with six accounts of felony child abuse and two accounts of felony domestic violence. As expected, it has created a rift in the already broken CPS movement.

In a recent livestream, Melissa is seen being arrested by the US Marshals. While it isn’t unheard of for a CPS “victim” to be arrested, it is almost never seen for the arresting agency be the US Marshals.

Since the time of her arrest, a lot of information has come to light, including a rather disturbing audio recording. The recording can be heard here. The video, taken only two months after brain surgery, is of Melissa’s child screaming in pain. The video in itself had us wondering why she chose to record this rather than go to the hospital? A grim answer we may never truly know, but speculate.

There are some very concerning red flags within this case. Red flags that other people had tried to question Diegel on in the past, their reply came in the form of a block. Currently, Melissa is in a Florida jail, awaiting to be moved to Arizona. A woman who played on the vulnerabilities of fellow victim advocates now sits as a testament on why personal emotions should always be seperated.

Many of the advocates within the CPS arena are victims themselves. The concept that anybody could be such a monster, is simply unfathomable. Sadly people, here is your monster. While many advocates, we hear, are smacking themselves over this, they shouldn’t. Take it as a lesson to improving your style and advocacy. Remember, not e erybody you meet is innocent.

Cyber terrorist smear campaign

We recently did a brief review of a man named John Anderson. John Anderson is a self proclaimed “pedo hunter,” a man claiming to expose pedophiles. However, it appears he does a bit more than that. When not getting his way, he begins to slander the reputations of his targets. Sound a bit familiar? It should as I myself had a similar situation in 2017.

Currently, Anderson is facing charges for making threats against multiple people online, namely death threats. In a video, posted in 2018, Anderson lists off people that he intended to kill for various reasons. Though he claims the arrest was a way to expose pedophiles, it sheds light onto his mental instability.

As I said, this is a very familiar smear campaign. We looked into the accusations made. The only portion that could be confirmed, is in regards to John Aster. Upon research, we found that there is, in fact, a John Aster on the Australian registry. However, how Meko would be “endorsing” Aster has yet to be seen; it seems to be nothing more tha a slander claim.

We made a post regarding Anderson on the WoC page. It didn’t take long for us to figure out how these people operate. Essentially, if you say anything against him, you are supporting, or endorsing, a pedophile. Below is a photo demonstrating this.

As with Meko of “The Daily Haze,” we are also accused of promoting John Aster. Keep in mind that we had no knowledge of who John Aster was, muchless ever speak to him. Because we had no clue as to who Aster was, we challenged the claim…no response was ever given.

As I said, Anderson is facing charges for making countless threats to people online… A lot of people, might I add. Anderson, is clearly unstable, as shown in a suicide video.

In this video, Anderson had apparantly called the police due to him wanting to commit suicide. When they show up, however, rather than talking to them, he goes on the offensive and begans to attack the police. At this point, we essentially ruled the video as attention whoring. It was very obvious that he had no intention of actually performing the act, he just wanted the police to show up.

So why are they attacking a journalist? From what we can tell, Anderson’s wife attempted to make contact with Meko some months back, Meko never responded. Our guess is this agitated them until they finally decided to go on the attack, of course this is a guess.

The pedophile claim requires no evidence and yet is still lethal. Once such a claim is made, it generally destroys a person’s reputation, even if it’s false. However, Anderson has more than enough dirt to discredit him, especially the video to which he threatens the lives of multiple people. While he tries to smear a creditable journalist, I fully believe it will be him who will lose.

While I write this, there are sites that appear to be gathering evidence against Anderson. It seems their intent is to pursue criminal charges for his various cyber terroristic threats. Given what we have seen thus far, we wish these sites the best of luck.

Known activist arrested for child abuse.

For approx. 5 years, activist and alleged CPS victim, Melissa Diegal took to social media in a variety of livestreams. In these videos, she would discuss her case against CPS, often pointing to the health condition of her children, who were on feeding tubes and wheelchair bound. In her final livestream, Melissa is seen being arrested by the U.S Marshalls, but why?

We recently obtained the above images from an anonymous source. According to these documents, Diegal is being arrested on eight accounts of child abuse and domestic violence. As we all know, however, accusation does not mean guilt. With that in mind, we probed around for more information.

We found several postings regarding the Diegal arrest. Within these posts were several comments that caught our attention. In the past, several people had questioned Diegal about her case. They never got a response, they were instantly blocked. On the phone, we spoke to a licensed advocate. She told WoC that she began asking Diegal questions. Her final question was, “why are you making this about you and not your children?” To this, she to was blocked.

The act of blocking people who ask, what we presume were the wrong questions, is suspicious. What we also find suspicious is the fact it was the U.S Marshalls who conducted her arrest. We have also recieved reports that her children are no longer on the feeding tubes, nor are they bound to wheelchairs. This information leads us to ask, “how do two children miraculously recover after being removed from their mother?”

We are going to follow this case, for now we withold our determination of guilt and innocence. What we do know is it is unusual for the U.S. Marshalls to be involved. Under normal conditions, she would be arrested by local police and sent to the arresting state. This action leads us to believe the prosecuting state has enough to establish guilt, it also implicates Diegal to be a flight risk.

If she is guilty, than for the past five years, she was successful in fooling everybody. However, it would fit into the category of Munchausen by proxy, a condition to which an individual keeps a person sick in attempt to gain attention. As it stands now, the CPS arena is again conflicted; those who scream abuser and those who scream innocent. To these claims, only time will tell.

John Anderson: quick review

Normally, I try to avoid writing about idiots and their frivolous smear campaigns. However, there is one being conducted that reminds me a bit to much of one I went through in 2017 and finally ended early this year. With that in mind, I felt compelled to write this. The group, “Support Actor John Anderson & Friends,” appears to be where it started. Their target: Meko Haze. Another group, presumed to be operated by the same people, “Monster Hunters,” has taken up the campaign as well. So who is John Anderson?

John Anderson is a self proclaimed “pedophile hunter.” in a recent post, to which they “expose” TDH Meko Haze, they go to say:

“This is the man we all confronted(,) associated with Elizabeth mason, John Aster, and many more exposed frauds and convicted pedophiles.
Keeps calling John Anderson’s number in direct attempt to ruin his case against Francesca Banfield and convicted pedophile John Aster, mark W Mumma, and more.
Meko just did a live trying to tarnish the case John Anderson has going against the exposed scum.
He keeps calling and using others to act as John Anderson in other calls he stages using spoofcalling.”

Let’s break this post down. To start, there is the accusation of being associated with frauds and pedophiles, they also claim to have confronted Meko. Upon our research, we found this to be completely false. To start, their idea of “confronting” is to block anybody who challenges this, or their various other claims; we learned this first hand when one of our guys called them out on their page and requested to see their evidence. This, if anything, confirmed with us that this was a case of slander. To address the pedophile aspect: this claim is derived because Meko is alleged to have a friend, who has a friend on the registry. That is not the claim made by their post, however.

They go onto list people he is apparantly in association with, another claim easily debunked. Not to long ago, “TDH” exposed Francesca Amato as a con-artist. If that is association, it’s a poorly done one. As for the other individuals listed, we found no evidence that they are pedophiles or any association with “The Daily Haze.” They go onto make the claim that Meko had been calling John Anderson. In a recent livestream conducted by Meko, not only is it obvious that John Anderson is the caller, it becomes clear that even this statement is false. The evidence further comes from another post Meko had made, to which he remarks about ignoring John’s wife who attempted to make contact months prior.

So let’s look into John Anderson. As I previously stated, he is a self proclaimed “pedophile hunter.” While he proclaims himself to be an “actor,” we had found no evidence to support this proclamation. But we did find a couple of videos, one that has Anderson in a world of trouble. In 2018, Anderson livestreamed a video. Within the video, he lists off individuals that he intended to murder. Within his list he names off Geri Pfeiffer, John Aster, and countless others; this is just one video. In a second video, Anderson can be seen attempting suicide. In the 35 minute video, Anderson is seen in a suicidal state speaking to an officer. While we essentially ruled this as an attention grabber, he had apparantly been called a pedophile himself. We find it ironic how those accused go onto orchestrate smear campaigns against others.

The issue with smear campaigns of this nature comes from the lack of evidence required to make it take flight. While no evidence is required to destroy an innocent life, the victim is often left having to prove the accusation false. The twisted aspect to this? Often times it is impossible for the victim to ever disprove the claim. In the end, the results of a campaign such as this will fall into two categories: those who believe the victim, and those who won’t.

For further information, and to see the videos, you can read the article published by “The Daily Haze” here.

Police brutality: in the words of a victim.

The following are the victim’s exact words to the police brutality he had suffered approx a year ago. WoC has made no alterations or corrections to this. This victim wished to be anonymous.

I just wanted to share this experience with everyone.

I was beaten up by the police a little over a year ago. I took a piss in a park-like area near a lake in the woods behind a tree in a bush, and got arrested for “burglary”, because there was an under-construction building nearby with a camera set up.

I was taken to jail. While I was in jail, I was asked if I was on probation.

I was. Because I was maliciously prosecuted without probable cause 2 years ago.

So I replied, “I’d prefer not to answer that without an attorney present.”

The cop said, “Fine I’m done. Go back to the waiting area.” I said “Okay,” looked up at the cop, got up, turned, and started walking back to the waiting area. When I was half-way there, the cop shouted, “Actually, you know what, go to the holding cell.”

So I turned to look at both the cop and the holding cell. Another cop had gotten up behind the first cop and was following behind the first cop.

The first cop walked around me, behind me, and randomly grabbed my arm, and twisted and yanked my arm.

I reacted very slightly mainly to the cop twisting my arm while yanking it. I mostly untwisted my arm, but also retracted it. I didn’t otherwise move. Keep in mind, the cop had walked around me, was behind me, and suddenly grabbed, twisted, and yanked my arm, from behind.

I said “okay” and allowed the cop to hold my arm, and relaxed.

The second cop walked up behind me, put one arm around my neck, and the other against the back of my head, in a “rear naked choke” or a (“carotid artery hold” in police lingo), and FORCED ME INTO UNCONSCIOUSNESS. The last thing I remember is being tipped backwards, and just trying to relax, and trying to “tap” with my one free hand, as I thought that would be best strategy to show them that I wasn’t a threat.

The next I was conscious, I was on the ground, on my stomach. The second cop still had his arm around my neck. He had shifted his other hand from the back of my head, to against the fist of his arm around my neck, to give himself extra leverage to crush my neck between his arm around my neck.

His knee was on my lower back, right on my kidney, and he had almost all his weight on that knee.

My head was turned, so I could see up a little bit.

The first cop still had my arm.

My other arm was underneath the shin of the second cop’s other leg.

This lasted about 4-6 minutes. Several things happened. I saw two other cops come, and heard a third, but didn’t get see him.

I was eventually handcuffed, lifted up, carried into the holding cell, placed on a bench face against the wall. One cop pulled out a tazer and pointed it at me until all the other cops left the cell, then said “If you move you’ll be tazered. Do you understand?” I said, “Yes. I don’t want any problems.” And the cop left.

I am suing the second cop. The one who assaulted me. I filed a claim with the County.

I was treated unreasonably dismissively by the person evaluating the claim, and was told by a County Supervisor that they don’t have any responsibility, and don’t want to politicize the situation (Sonoma County, California, Linda Hopkins, and Janelle Crane).

I was instructed to report the incident to Internal Affairs, and I did, but I shouldn’t have, because all that accomplished was ruining my chance to get untainted depositions.

I’m also suing for what I was on probation for. The magistrate judge dismissed that whole case. This is about whether they can do whatever they want because of their position in society, including commit crimes, and the judge is saying “yep”. They have “absolute immunity”, even though they had no probable cause, and I came with better legal citations than the judge. (The judge was wrong, they don’t.)

So now I have to appeal.

And I am getting ready to file this second lawsuit.

Mackenzie Branham: police cover-up?

Donald Branham is your typical father; a man who would sacrifice anything for his children. The concept of losing a child is one that could only exist within nightmares. Unfortunantly for Donald, this nightmare has now become a cold harsh reality.

In 2006 Mackenzie was an articulated little girl. 8 years of age, parents divorced, she would often split her time between mother and father. On April 27th, 2006 Mackenzie had been staying with her mother. It would later be discovered, during post-mortem testing, that she had been previously raped, more on that later.

In the early morning hours, a sudden, amd mysterious fire, took place. Mackenzie’s mother Maryanne, her boyfriend Kenny, and suspiciously enough the dog, managed to escape unharmed. While they stood outside the blazing inferno, in the second floor bedroom a little girl would perish.

The house where Mackenzie sadly lost her life. Her room was located on the second floor.

Protocol, under normal circumstances, state that a fire containing a death are to be treated as a homicide until otherwise proven. However, the Fayette County Sheriff’s Department failed to uphold this. In fact, it appears that they have willfully sabotaged the entire case. It makes a person wonder why. We began asking questions about the boyfriend, keeping in mind the claim of rape.

As it turns out, Kenny had family within the department, one being a sargeant. Initially, Mackenzie’s death was ruled “accidental.” It was then upgraded to “suspicious,” and finally “homocide.” We know, from our investigation, the police destroyed the investigation. Early on, Mackenzie tested positive for semen, this is conclusive of rape. Being that she was in the home with her mother, and her boyfriend, that narrows the list of suspects, though this remains inconclusive.

Within the first month of Mackenzie’s death, the Fayatte county sheriff’s department had already began destroying the evidence. The destroyed evidence wasn’t minor things, either. Clothing, 9-1-1 calls, etc. seemingly began to vanish. All evidence that could identify the rapist, and potential murderer, destroyed. While we aren’t big into conspiracy theories, this is extremely suspicious for a department to do…especially so early into an open investigation.

What we are providing, within this article, is just a brief description into this case; we haven’t even discussed the deeper aspects of what has happened, this will have to be done in a future article. Mackenzie was a young lady who did not deserve the cruel fate that was bestowed upon her. She did not deserve the confirmed rape nor being burned alive. For her father, Donald, his love for his kids, as well as Mackenzie’s memory, drive him toward seeking the truth: why was she killed?

You can look at the evidence for yourself, there is simply to much for us to share here. To do that, you can join his Facebook group here.