All posts by War on Corruption

I am not one to hide my thoughts; we have the Government who does enough of that for us. I am a blogger who talks about the things, events, and outrages of our world. Join the Revolution! https://www.facebook.com/wocf4t

Facebook Wars: The attack on Freedom

Sometime ago, we wrote another article pertaining to Facebook and it’s apparent war on media. To some regard, this is a bit of a follow-up article to that. Since the time of our previous article, Facebook has not only continued it’s unjust attack against independent media platforms, it appears to have increased the attack. The most common reason given for any platform being removed, “X post has violated our Community Standards.” So, seeing that posted by so many, we decided to take a look at their community standards. What we ultimately found, was a policy purposefully written to be extremely vague. Even with the vague writings, it remained obvious that Facebook, was in fact, in violation of their own policy. This article is going to break the policies, to which we believe are being implicated, down for everybody.

Community Standards: Section III Part 11: Hate Speech.

Below are a couple of paragraphs from the “Hate Speech” section of their Community Standards. For those of us, who have been on Facebook for awhile now, we have seen this policy broken by the Social Media giant countless times. How? Let’s review it:

We define hate speech as a direct attack on people based on what we call protected characteristics — race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, caste, sex, gender, gender identity, and serious disease or disability. We also provide some protections for immigration status. We define attack as violent or dehumanizing speech, statements of inferiority, or calls for exclusion or segregation. We separate attacks into three tiers of severity, as described below.

Sometimes people share content containing someone else’s hate speech for the purpose of raising awareness or educating others. In some cases, words or terms that might otherwise violate our standards are used self-referentially or in an empowering way. People sometimes express contempt in the context of a romantic break-up. Other times, they use gender-exclusive language to control membership in a health or positive support group, such as a breastfeeding group for women only. In all of these cases, we allow the content but expect people to clearly indicate their intent, which helps us better understand why they shared it. Where the intention is unclear, we may remove the content.”

In the past, we have seen cases to which Facebook removed hate speech. However, we have also seen them outright ignore it. The first paragraph is very important in that it informs you as to what they define as hate speech. The contradiction, however, comes within the second paragraph; specifically, these sentences:

People sometimes express contempt in the context of a romantic break-up. Other times, they use gender-exclusive language to control membership in a health or positive support group, such as a breastfeeding group for women only. In all of these cases, we allow the content but expect people to clearly indicate their intent, which helps us better understand why they shared it.”

Now, if you’re like me, chances are you have shared something along these lines; you shared something to bring awareness to the initial form of hate speech. In the case of me doing it, for example, Facebook banned my account for 30 days while leaving the post I was exposing up. In fact, according to Facebook, the original post was not in violation.

But the bulls-eye on the independent journalist doesn’t end there. Another area, to which Facebook has targeted journalists is:

Part IV: Integrity and Authenticity: Section 16: Spam

We work hard to limit the spread of commercial spam to prevent false advertising, fraud, and security breaches, all of which detract from people’s ability to share and connect. We do not allow people to use misleading or inaccurate information to collect likes, followers, or shares.”

This policy, as a whole, is highly questionable. Not only is it extremely vague, it leaves to many doors open, one door is a rather new policy of theirs, however we will get into that later. This policy has literally made it so that it’s up for interpretation as to what “spam” is. You get a media platform, for example, that posts often on a specific arena, Facebook could potentially remove that platform utilizing the claim that they are “spamming” the site. In fact, they could go as far as to state they are spamming the site with “hate speech.” this one paragraph has, in the past, raised questions. And seeing that this is all Facebook has written within this section, it’s obvious as to why.

While section 17 is also one for concern, let’s skip to the section that is really important within Part IV.

Section 18: Fake News

Reducing the spread of false news on Facebook is a responsibility that we take seriously. We also recognize that this is a challenging and sensitive issue. We want to help people stay informed without stifling productive public discourse. There is also a fine line between false news and satire or opinion. For these reasons, we don’t remove false news from Facebook but instead, significantly reduce its distribution by showing it lower in the News Feed.”

Now this policy has, to some regard, affected War on Corruption. The problem here lies beyond what Facebook is claiming, this one goes into “Freedom of Speech” and “censorship.” the problem with this policy, like so many, is it’s extremely vague. Furthermore, this policy raises many questions regarding Facebook’s stance on constitutional rights and liberties. According to Facebook, they wish to maintain a “safe environment.” However, it seems they also wish to silence any platform that attempts to conduct legitimate journalism. Because of how this policy is written, it can essentially be translated to say, “We, at Facebook, intend to impede any media platform that politically opposes our ideology.” At least this wording is more accurate.

Facebook literally has a novel sized section of policies. Like the above mentioned, most of their policies are extremely vague and left for individual interpretation. One thing that is not vague, however, is how Facebook utilizes the vagueness of these policies. Due to the way they are written, it has given Facebook a back-door into enforcing them when, and how, they see fit. Because of this, multiple platforms within the past year have suffered; the most recent platform within the long list, “The Daily Haze” (TDH.) It is apparent that Facebook conducts a malicious form of censorship, silencing anybody who opposes them. The solution? The only solution is to simply find another Social media site.

Advertisements

(Discreditation) Victim or guilty?

About a month or so ago, I recieved a screenshot. In the photo, it had a phone number of a woman who wanted to get into contact. Today, without reason, she attacked the guy who was looking into her case. Her friends have now come to our Facebook page to continue the assault. This is our response to her friends, who insist on bringing their fight to WoC.

About a month or so, as stated, either this individual, or our team, made contact. Her friend, who attempted to start a fight on our Facebook, claims she did not want our “opinion” regarding her case.

As you can clearly see, that is not the case. Not only did she give a contact number (omitted for privacy,) she even encouraged contact. We had intended to do this. However, we were still digging around into her case. We wanted to at least have some information prior to contact.

In one image, she claims to have no idea who our guy is, muchless how he got onto her friends list. We have already proven this to be a lie. Her behavior, being unprovoked however, has me questioning her CPS case. I have seen many “innocent” people, later proven guilty, act just like this. While being under stress is common with a CPS case, it also has an odd way of showing a persons’ true colors.

Diegal case: new information

As are most people, we have been following the Melissa Diegel case. Melissa Diegel, for the past five years, was known for uploading livestream videos regarding her CPS case, a case she apparantly lost years ago. Recently, Diegel was charged with six accounts of felony child abuse and two accounts of felony domestic violence. As expected, it has created a rift in the already broken CPS movement.

In a recent livestream, Melissa is seen being arrested by the US Marshals. While it isn’t unheard of for a CPS “victim” to be arrested, it is almost never seen for the arresting agency be the US Marshals.

Since the time of her arrest, a lot of information has come to light, including a rather disturbing audio recording. The recording can be heard here. The video, taken only two months after brain surgery, is of Melissa’s child screaming in pain. The video in itself had us wondering why she chose to record this rather than go to the hospital? A grim answer we may never truly know, but speculate.

There are some very concerning red flags within this case. Red flags that other people had tried to question Diegel on in the past, their reply came in the form of a block. Currently, Melissa is in a Florida jail, awaiting to be moved to Arizona. A woman who played on the vulnerabilities of fellow victim advocates now sits as a testament on why personal emotions should always be seperated.

Many of the advocates within the CPS arena are victims themselves. The concept that anybody could be such a monster, is simply unfathomable. Sadly people, here is your monster. While many advocates, we hear, are smacking themselves over this, they shouldn’t. Take it as a lesson to improving your style and advocacy. Remember, not e erybody you meet is innocent.

Cyber terrorist smear campaign

We recently did a brief review of a man named John Anderson. John Anderson is a self proclaimed “pedo hunter,” a man claiming to expose pedophiles. However, it appears he does a bit more than that. When not getting his way, he begins to slander the reputations of his targets. Sound a bit familiar? It should as I myself had a similar situation in 2017.

Currently, Anderson is facing charges for making threats against multiple people online, namely death threats. In a video, posted in 2018, Anderson lists off people that he intended to kill for various reasons. Though he claims the arrest was a way to expose pedophiles, it sheds light onto his mental instability.

As I said, this is a very familiar smear campaign. We looked into the accusations made. The only portion that could be confirmed, is in regards to John Aster. Upon research, we found that there is, in fact, a John Aster on the Australian registry. However, how Meko would be “endorsing” Aster has yet to be seen; it seems to be nothing more tha a slander claim.

We made a post regarding Anderson on the WoC page. It didn’t take long for us to figure out how these people operate. Essentially, if you say anything against him, you are supporting, or endorsing, a pedophile. Below is a photo demonstrating this.

As with Meko of “The Daily Haze,” we are also accused of promoting John Aster. Keep in mind that we had no knowledge of who John Aster was, muchless ever speak to him. Because we had no clue as to who Aster was, we challenged the claim…no response was ever given.

As I said, Anderson is facing charges for making countless threats to people online… A lot of people, might I add. Anderson, is clearly unstable, as shown in a suicide video.

In this video, Anderson had apparantly called the police due to him wanting to commit suicide. When they show up, however, rather than talking to them, he goes on the offensive and begans to attack the police. At this point, we essentially ruled the video as attention whoring. It was very obvious that he had no intention of actually performing the act, he just wanted the police to show up.

So why are they attacking a journalist? From what we can tell, Anderson’s wife attempted to make contact with Meko some months back, Meko never responded. Our guess is this agitated them until they finally decided to go on the attack, of course this is a guess.

The pedophile claim requires no evidence and yet is still lethal. Once such a claim is made, it generally destroys a person’s reputation, even if it’s false. However, Anderson has more than enough dirt to discredit him, especially the video to which he threatens the lives of multiple people. While he tries to smear a creditable journalist, I fully believe it will be him who will lose.

While I write this, there are sites that appear to be gathering evidence against Anderson. It seems their intent is to pursue criminal charges for his various cyber terroristic threats. Given what we have seen thus far, we wish these sites the best of luck.

Known activist arrested for child abuse.

For approx. 5 years, activist and alleged CPS victim, Melissa Diegal took to social media in a variety of livestreams. In these videos, she would discuss her case against CPS, often pointing to the health condition of her children, who were on feeding tubes and wheelchair bound. In her final livestream, Melissa is seen being arrested by the U.S Marshalls, but why?

We recently obtained the above images from an anonymous source. According to these documents, Diegal is being arrested on eight accounts of child abuse and domestic violence. As we all know, however, accusation does not mean guilt. With that in mind, we probed around for more information.

We found several postings regarding the Diegal arrest. Within these posts were several comments that caught our attention. In the past, several people had questioned Diegal about her case. They never got a response, they were instantly blocked. On the phone, we spoke to a licensed advocate. She told WoC that she began asking Diegal questions. Her final question was, “why are you making this about you and not your children?” To this, she to was blocked.

The act of blocking people who ask, what we presume were the wrong questions, is suspicious. What we also find suspicious is the fact it was the U.S Marshalls who conducted her arrest. We have also recieved reports that her children are no longer on the feeding tubes, nor are they bound to wheelchairs. This information leads us to ask, “how do two children miraculously recover after being removed from their mother?”

We are going to follow this case, for now we withold our determination of guilt and innocence. What we do know is it is unusual for the U.S. Marshalls to be involved. Under normal conditions, she would be arrested by local police and sent to the arresting state. This action leads us to believe the prosecuting state has enough to establish guilt, it also implicates Diegal to be a flight risk.

If she is guilty, than for the past five years, she was successful in fooling everybody. However, it would fit into the category of Munchausen by proxy, a condition to which an individual keeps a person sick in attempt to gain attention. As it stands now, the CPS arena is again conflicted; those who scream abuser and those who scream innocent. To these claims, only time will tell.

John Anderson: quick review

Normally, I try to avoid writing about idiots and their frivolous smear campaigns. However, there is one being conducted that reminds me a bit to much of one I went through in 2017 and finally ended early this year. With that in mind, I felt compelled to write this. The group, “Support Actor John Anderson & Friends,” appears to be where it started. Their target: Meko Haze. Another group, presumed to be operated by the same people, “Monster Hunters,” has taken up the campaign as well. So who is John Anderson?

John Anderson is a self proclaimed “pedophile hunter.” in a recent post, to which they “expose” TDH Meko Haze, they go to say:

“This is the man we all confronted(,) associated with Elizabeth mason, John Aster, and many more exposed frauds and convicted pedophiles.
Keeps calling John Anderson’s number in direct attempt to ruin his case against Francesca Banfield and convicted pedophile John Aster, mark W Mumma, and more.
Meko just did a live trying to tarnish the case John Anderson has going against the exposed scum.
He keeps calling and using others to act as John Anderson in other calls he stages using spoofcalling.”

Let’s break this post down. To start, there is the accusation of being associated with frauds and pedophiles, they also claim to have confronted Meko. Upon our research, we found this to be completely false. To start, their idea of “confronting” is to block anybody who challenges this, or their various other claims; we learned this first hand when one of our guys called them out on their page and requested to see their evidence. This, if anything, confirmed with us that this was a case of slander. To address the pedophile aspect: this claim is derived because Meko is alleged to have a friend, who has a friend on the registry. That is not the claim made by their post, however.

They go onto list people he is apparantly in association with, another claim easily debunked. Not to long ago, “TDH” exposed Francesca Amato as a con-artist. If that is association, it’s a poorly done one. As for the other individuals listed, we found no evidence that they are pedophiles or any association with “The Daily Haze.” They go onto make the claim that Meko had been calling John Anderson. In a recent livestream conducted by Meko, not only is it obvious that John Anderson is the caller, it becomes clear that even this statement is false. The evidence further comes from another post Meko had made, to which he remarks about ignoring John’s wife who attempted to make contact months prior.

So let’s look into John Anderson. As I previously stated, he is a self proclaimed “pedophile hunter.” While he proclaims himself to be an “actor,” we had found no evidence to support this proclamation. But we did find a couple of videos, one that has Anderson in a world of trouble. In 2018, Anderson livestreamed a video. Within the video, he lists off individuals that he intended to murder. Within his list he names off Geri Pfeiffer, John Aster, and countless others; this is just one video. In a second video, Anderson can be seen attempting suicide. In the 35 minute video, Anderson is seen in a suicidal state speaking to an officer. While we essentially ruled this as an attention grabber, he had apparantly been called a pedophile himself. We find it ironic how those accused go onto orchestrate smear campaigns against others.

The issue with smear campaigns of this nature comes from the lack of evidence required to make it take flight. While no evidence is required to destroy an innocent life, the victim is often left having to prove the accusation false. The twisted aspect to this? Often times it is impossible for the victim to ever disprove the claim. In the end, the results of a campaign such as this will fall into two categories: those who believe the victim, and those who won’t.

For further information, and to see the videos, you can read the article published by “The Daily Haze” here.

Police brutality: in the words of a victim.

The following are the victim’s exact words to the police brutality he had suffered approx a year ago. WoC has made no alterations or corrections to this. This victim wished to be anonymous.

I just wanted to share this experience with everyone.

I was beaten up by the police a little over a year ago. I took a piss in a park-like area near a lake in the woods behind a tree in a bush, and got arrested for “burglary”, because there was an under-construction building nearby with a camera set up.

I was taken to jail. While I was in jail, I was asked if I was on probation.

I was. Because I was maliciously prosecuted without probable cause 2 years ago.

So I replied, “I’d prefer not to answer that without an attorney present.”

The cop said, “Fine I’m done. Go back to the waiting area.” I said “Okay,” looked up at the cop, got up, turned, and started walking back to the waiting area. When I was half-way there, the cop shouted, “Actually, you know what, go to the holding cell.”

So I turned to look at both the cop and the holding cell. Another cop had gotten up behind the first cop and was following behind the first cop.

The first cop walked around me, behind me, and randomly grabbed my arm, and twisted and yanked my arm.

I reacted very slightly mainly to the cop twisting my arm while yanking it. I mostly untwisted my arm, but also retracted it. I didn’t otherwise move. Keep in mind, the cop had walked around me, was behind me, and suddenly grabbed, twisted, and yanked my arm, from behind.

I said “okay” and allowed the cop to hold my arm, and relaxed.

The second cop walked up behind me, put one arm around my neck, and the other against the back of my head, in a “rear naked choke” or a (“carotid artery hold” in police lingo), and FORCED ME INTO UNCONSCIOUSNESS. The last thing I remember is being tipped backwards, and just trying to relax, and trying to “tap” with my one free hand, as I thought that would be best strategy to show them that I wasn’t a threat.

The next I was conscious, I was on the ground, on my stomach. The second cop still had his arm around my neck. He had shifted his other hand from the back of my head, to against the fist of his arm around my neck, to give himself extra leverage to crush my neck between his arm around my neck.

His knee was on my lower back, right on my kidney, and he had almost all his weight on that knee.

My head was turned, so I could see up a little bit.

The first cop still had my arm.

My other arm was underneath the shin of the second cop’s other leg.

This lasted about 4-6 minutes. Several things happened. I saw two other cops come, and heard a third, but didn’t get see him.

I was eventually handcuffed, lifted up, carried into the holding cell, placed on a bench face against the wall. One cop pulled out a tazer and pointed it at me until all the other cops left the cell, then said “If you move you’ll be tazered. Do you understand?” I said, “Yes. I don’t want any problems.” And the cop left.

I am suing the second cop. The one who assaulted me. I filed a claim with the County.

I was treated unreasonably dismissively by the person evaluating the claim, and was told by a County Supervisor that they don’t have any responsibility, and don’t want to politicize the situation (Sonoma County, California, Linda Hopkins, and Janelle Crane).

I was instructed to report the incident to Internal Affairs, and I did, but I shouldn’t have, because all that accomplished was ruining my chance to get untainted depositions.

I’m also suing for what I was on probation for. The magistrate judge dismissed that whole case. This is about whether they can do whatever they want because of their position in society, including commit crimes, and the judge is saying “yep”. They have “absolute immunity”, even though they had no probable cause, and I came with better legal citations than the judge. (The judge was wrong, they don’t.)

So now I have to appeal.

And I am getting ready to file this second lawsuit.

Mackenzie Branham: police cover-up?

Donald Branham is your typical father; a man who would sacrifice anything for his children. The concept of losing a child is one that could only exist within nightmares. Unfortunantly for Donald, this nightmare has now become a cold harsh reality.

In 2006 Mackenzie was an articulated little girl. 8 years of age, parents divorced, she would often split her time between mother and father. On April 27th, 2006 Mackenzie had been staying with her mother. It would later be discovered, during post-mortem testing, that she had been previously raped, more on that later.

In the early morning hours, a sudden, amd mysterious fire, took place. Mackenzie’s mother Maryanne, her boyfriend Kenny, and suspiciously enough the dog, managed to escape unharmed. While they stood outside the blazing inferno, in the second floor bedroom a little girl would perish.

The house where Mackenzie sadly lost her life. Her room was located on the second floor.

Protocol, under normal circumstances, state that a fire containing a death are to be treated as a homicide until otherwise proven. However, the Fayette County Sheriff’s Department failed to uphold this. In fact, it appears that they have willfully sabotaged the entire case. It makes a person wonder why. We began asking questions about the boyfriend, keeping in mind the claim of rape.

As it turns out, Kenny had family within the department, one being a sargeant. Initially, Mackenzie’s death was ruled “accidental.” It was then upgraded to “suspicious,” and finally “homocide.” We know, from our investigation, the police destroyed the investigation. Early on, Mackenzie tested positive for semen, this is conclusive of rape. Being that she was in the home with her mother, and her boyfriend, that narrows the list of suspects, though this remains inconclusive.

Within the first month of Mackenzie’s death, the Fayatte county sheriff’s department had already began destroying the evidence. The destroyed evidence wasn’t minor things, either. Clothing, 9-1-1 calls, etc. seemingly began to vanish. All evidence that could identify the rapist, and potential murderer, destroyed. While we aren’t big into conspiracy theories, this is extremely suspicious for a department to do…especially so early into an open investigation.

What we are providing, within this article, is just a brief description into this case; we haven’t even discussed the deeper aspects of what has happened, this will have to be done in a future article. Mackenzie was a young lady who did not deserve the cruel fate that was bestowed upon her. She did not deserve the confirmed rape nor being burned alive. For her father, Donald, his love for his kids, as well as Mackenzie’s memory, drive him toward seeking the truth: why was she killed?

You can look at the evidence for yourself, there is simply to much for us to share here. To do that, you can join his Facebook group here.

“Advocate” exploits sexual abuse victim

In a perfect world, we wouldn’t have to write this article. Something that should be obvious, apparantly isn’t for Francesca Amato-Banfield. Obviously, you shouldn’t exploit a sexual abuse victim as a means of pushing sales on your book. Nor should you use such a case to gain momentum for your “organization.” Francesca has done both.

A video, containing a father and a child of approx 5yo, has the Facebook community in an uproar. In the video, the father, identified as Sean Windingland, is seen speaking to his daughter. We won’t go into full detail due to the graphic content. In short, it is him asking about her previous consent to perform sexual acts together. With a topic this hot, it is not to our amazement that the scammers would jump in.

Francesca, earlier today, did a livestream in which she displays the video. As a “child advocate,” the most fundamental understanding of protecting a victim child’s identity should be a no brainer. Francesca, however, failed to understand this. Blasting the uncensored video, initially posted by the group, “Pedo-Hunters,” the child’s face is seen to all. But the video goes downhill.

Within the first five minutes, Francesca (pictured below) begins promoting her own book. What starts out as a rant regarding a pedophile father, tirns into an advertisement for “best seller.” Within the video, she later begins advertising her own organization while pushing her radical agendas.

One thing is clear from watching this video. It is obvious that she conducted no research into the child’s situation. If Francesca had spent a little more time doing research, and less time advertising, she would had learned that the victim is now with the mother, away from the father. She would had also known that the child is completely safe, at this time, thus making her entire video redundant and void.

However, she failed to do any research. For Francesca, this appears to be a habitual problem. Rather it be making accusations against those who oppose her scam, bullying victims, or simply spouting off, it seems that she does next to no research into her claims. Her other pattern seems to be broadcastimg her book. A good writer has no need to push their work as she does. The reason is simply because it’s good. The readers would spread it around naturally. The fact that she has to constantly advertise her book leads me to question its sells. Has it sold only a few copies?

Regardless of this, it is clear that Francesca screwed up here. As an advocate she should had placed the safety and dignity of this child first. She should had declined to show the video, perhaps just played the audio. However, because Francesca saw an oppurtunity to advertise, she may have done more harm than good. This young girl’s face will forever be online, her story and identity exposed to the entire world. Not only was this neglectful, this was absolutely immoral.

A simple blurring of the girl’s face would had prevented many things. It would had also se ured the child’s integrity. Because Francesca was more concerned about making a quick dollar, this child’s identity has been further exposed. What effects it will have on the girl are yet to be seen. What is crystal clear, however, is bow low Francesca is willing to go just to promote a book and organization.

Is the movement a failure? A review of the CPS movement

If there is something that can be disputed, chances are it has a movement against it. So it should be presumed that something as contraversial as CPS/DFS would rally an entire network of advocates, activists, and victims alike. Because of current technology, as well as social media, to get involved in such a movement is fairly easy, to say the least. But is this movement legit or is it just a satiracal joke?

The CPS movement, as a whole, has a rather powerful concept with an equally powerful message. Like a painter crafting on their easle, they blast a powerful message: “stop taking, killing, adopting, and trafficking our children!” From the outside, the movement appears to be an army worthy of any advesary. From the inside, that’s where we begin to see its true form.

As journalists, we often get the “help me” cries. Parents who have lost their children, blindly walking into a maze littered with snakes, waiting to strike their heels. To conduct a story on such cases, however, we have to establish credibility for it. For example, if a parent gave their child “Drano,” obviously, we couldn’t absolve them within the article. For the parents that don’t contact independent media platforms, they reach out to the advocates of Facebook. But are they safe in doing so?

In a perfect world, they would be. However, as recent and old articles demonstrate, that is not always the case. With any movement of potential, there are always preditorial people hoping to make a quick dollar from it; the CPS movement is of no exception. Sadly, this sort of movement seems to attract these predators.

In 2017, we all witnessed the first of these people. A CPS case, which was still open at thus point, had case files blasted all over Facebook by a 501c3 organization. The organization obtained intimate details of the open case, and in a sudden “smear campaign” released these documents for the entire world to see. People, naturally were enraged, at least those with ethics, and began a counter assault. By the end of it, people were accused of “pedophilia,” actively, and offline, stalked, and smeared along with the CPS victim.

But this is one example. Another organization, ran by Connie Reguli, willfully allowed a convicted pedophile into her group. During this time, until his account was was terminated per Facebook policy, he had been collecting information for a book. However, when reading his book, all we found was a confession to his crimes alongside material written by others. Where did the various collected information really go?

Beyond that, we have another woman pushing the sovereign citizen agenda, the very ones that landed Ronnie Davis in prison. She pushes an affadavit, a highly illegal one at that, claiming it will help in any CPS case. While a magical “cure-all” would seem appealing, her claim isn’t without flaw. First, why hasn’t she posted evidence that it works? And why has nobody come out to reinforce that it works?

These are just a few examples of the plagues within the movement. But there are more problems than just scammers and cons; the movement has issues within its actual legitimate groups. Many, if not nearly all, of the groups suffer from “in fighting.” In fighting is a commonly used term to which advocate A deals a blow to advocate B and so on. When a group is dealing with victims, stress is the last thing they need. However, the fighting continues regardless. But it doean’t stop there.

Over the years, we have gotten many CPS coverage requests. For whatever reason a child was taken and the parents need the media. For 99.9% of these claims, they share one commonality. Upon being asked for documentation, primarily sl we have an understanding of the case as CPS sees it, we never actually get those. When asked, the families grow silent all while slamming CPS for removing the child(ren.) It almost seems like they have something to hide. Credibilty is everything within a movement. If the movement lacks credibility, nobody will take it seriously. But, this movement has a few redeeming, and legit people.

For some advocates, merely speaking out isn’t enough. In fact, some cover a variety of subjects. For instance, Randy Davis of team #revitup. Rosemary Dalton of M.A.F.A., and even Geri Pfieffer of America’s Taken Children. These groups, and organizations, are a collective of passionate indivuduals. While they work in different ways, they work together, even if they are unaware of this factor.

Team #revitup, if you are unaware is the “no bulls***” group. With Randy Davis, no relation to Ronnie, the corrupted are exposed in elegant glamour. M.A.F.A. is the group of compassion. Ms. Dalton has devoted many years of her life, even with failing health, to comfort and show love to families in need. America’s Taken targets the children who have been forcibly adopted. With her group, she gives these families the tools to potentially reunite and become a family once more.

Every movement has its flaws, thisone is by far an exception. But, like any movement, you can see the darkness within or you can choose to see through the darkness within. While we do not believe the entire movement is legit, there are glimpses of truth and credibility within the twisted wreckage. That is what we should be promoting.