The information provided here is done so with two reasons in mind.
1. Other victims can file lawsuits against 501c3 U.B.F.U.C.T. and its president.
2. For informational reasons.
PDFS/photos captured
Update 8-15-17
Scroll and you will see where he randomly attacked a person. In a PM, the target was told to “lick a sh#### d###.” The justification was the target was Matt. Yet another lie with no merit.
https://1drv.ms/b/s!Ahg5yh8fxlA9hXaYkqMGp-NlEzoi
The first pdf taken of “The truth is out!!” wall.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B45UIQf_2BCBVlpkTjhNQkNpdWs/view?usp=drivesdk
The following versions exist because the admin removed various slanderous postings.
The following PDF is where it all publically started.
When our lead journalist came to the defense of Rosemary and M.A.F.A., Mr. Worland began a smear campaign against him and our platform. This is clearly shown below.
At this point, Matt was actually attempting to salvage his reputation. Due to the extreme nature of the slanderings, our platform is currently petitioning a lawsuit.
However, the slandering didn’t stop at just him.
Even with 20+ victims, he still has time to violate a protection order.
Response when served with an EPO
Even makes time to retarget Cindy
This post would begin nearly four months of hell…a hell that some of the victims are now reliving due to Mr. Worland’s dangerous instability.
Regardless of the fact a state judge has informed Mr. Worland that Matt is NOT a pedophile, he maintains his stance. This is just one case in which he makes the accusation.
Mr. Worland began a mass campaign against all people who befriended Rosemary. Zoë, who has had no contact with him prior to this, became a target, as did Kara.
Beyond all of the previous disturbing evidences, there are also indirect threats.
Yet another smear campaign
In yet another instance, Phil calls Matt a pedophile. The case he used is one that:
A: did not involve children.
B: was closed due to several contradictions in witness accounts that lead to a rule 6 hearing for lack of evidence.
This post is his recap of a protection order, that is in effect. The very post violated the order.
As if his terror toward people was not enough, he recruited a team to further harass, torment, and mentally drive people to their breaking point. One individual has clinical depression, Phil has targeted, and had his friends, target them the most.
In regards to Linda Hickey aka Linda Clanahan, if you go to Missouri casenet, type in the Clanahan name, you will see half a dozen convictions for stalking.
On June 17, we got this audio recording. It is a phone call between Jason Dover, Phil’s best friend, and Rosemary.
Becky Kemble harasses Matt’s mother, alleging him to be a pedophile. You can see how bad that goes as she did not get her desired response.
UPDATE:
According to Matt, Phil yelled at him outside the courthouse…where several witnesses heard, including an attorney who was crossing the street at the time.att is currently in discussions of filing lawsuits against, both, Mr. Worland and his organization. Below, we are submitting information regarding Missouri harassment laws in hopes that he grow up, move forward, and cease further acts of harassment.
There are countless laws on this.
EVIDENCE UPDATE 1
he day prior to the attacks on M.A.F.A, its founder, and our lead journalist, it was made abundantly clear that he intended to target various people.
One such individual, Luis Ewing, was accused of being oyr lead, Matt. We can only speculate that the last name is the reason.
Following that, are the results from the national sex offenders database. Although a judge has already confirmed Mr. Ewing to not be a pedophile, Mr. Worland continues to make the claim.
The national database confirming that our lead is NOT on the registry. Below that, Phil himself confirms this. He would later retract this statement. However, this statement has unknowingly tied the noose in his rope should Matt file suit.
The following picture, he confesses that he forced one victim into doing what she wanted. He, again smears Matt. However, at no point has Matt ever claimed to be an advocate. It is, at this point, Mr. Worland’s intention becomes clear; it is purely a personal vendetta against Mr. Ewing for standing up to him.
The following picture confirms our claim: Mr. Worland’s malicious slander is driven off the fact that our lead journalist protected a close friend. Following that, Mr. Worland attacks and degrades Ms. Dalton.
A discussion from one of Mr. Worland’s friends. Following this discussion, she was banned.
