It is, without say, that articles go along way. However, evidence goes even further. We have decided to make another gallery, documenting Nicotra’s unethical, and potentially illegal, behaviors. This, like the Onision gallery, will be updated as needed.
A small Youtuber, known as “Raven queen official,” has become the centerfold of anger. From alleged videos containing animal abuse, confirmed videos of murder threats, she has violated, not only Youtube’s TOS, but multiple laws. Below are two examples of her videos, we are not uploading them to Youtube due to the content. While we could write out an entire article on this girl, we will just let her own videos do the speaking.
Notice: the content of the videos may be disturbing for some viewers.
Former “web designer,” Vincent Nicotra, has been the target of various unethical and even illegal activities. While we had been following this, mildly, that has since changed. If you haven’t been following the Nicotra situation, let’s get you caught up.
Vincent, of “Ven interactive Media“, was originally in charge of websites for journalist, Chris Hansen. Nicotra recently was given the public spotlight when he filed multiple false DMCA claims against various Youtubers. However, his criminal, and unethical, activities didn’t stop there.
Even prior to Nicotra’s termination from Hansen, there have been accusations in regards to doxxing. While we normally don’t discuss hearsay, there are multiple individuals making this claim. Oxford defines doxxing as, the “search for and publishment of private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.”
While doxxing is illegal, it is often hard to get an actual conviction. In many cases, it’s simply to difficult to establish who the doxxer actually is. However, that’s if the doxxer plays it smart, something Vincent has clearly failed to do. While he has been exposed by his victims, and countless others, it appears to have no effect on Vincent’s behavior.
Alongside the doxxing accusations, Nicotra is also accused of filing false DMCA claims. Baked Salmon and Wes Moast, being a constant target of such claims. Recently Baked Salmon even had his channel shutdown as a result of Vincent’s false DMCA reports. While the channel has since been restored, this doesn’t change the malicious intent behind Vincent’s actions.
Baked Salmon is an individual who has a history of being critical of Hansen and Nicotra. It is possible that the subjects within the video is what lead Nicotra’s actions. Even if this were to be true, it doean’t make the action any less illegal. While Hansen has, in recent times, apologized for the false DMCA claims, Nicotra has only continued to make the false reports. So what exactly is DMCA?
A DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) claim is intended to prevent copyright infringement. However, Vincent has apparantly forgotten that. In filing a DMCA claim, Vincent is claiming property ownership of the videos posted. The problem, however, is upon watching the videos targeted, it’s obvious that the claim is false. What Nicotra may not be aware of is section 512(f) of the DMCA. Section 512(f) of the DMCA act places legal liability on any person who willfully, and knowingly, files a false claim; remember, a DMCA claim is a legally binding document and can be used in court.
The computer and the FBI
One tidbit that has been circulating Twitter, in regards of Nicotra, is the infamous computer. A victim of Onision had apparantly sent a computer, containing evidence against Onision, to Vincent. Upon recieving the computer, it was supposed to be forwarded to the FBI. Sounds like a great plan, right? The problem is, and recently confirmed by Chris Hansen himself, is Vincent never actually sent it. Instead, after months of holding it, he sent it back to the victim. By doing this, it raises questions as to rather or not Nicotra was purposefully trying to derail the Onision investigation. In the end, we may never know the real reason as to why he did this.
Regardless of how you speak out, if it’s against Nicotra, you can ensure that problems will occur. Upon being terminated, the website, “Hansen vs. Predators,” was essentially taken hostage by Nicotra. Since the time of this event, the website has been put up for auction. Various other individuals, who have spoken against Nicotra, were met with insults, DMCA claims, and even the loss of their channels.
Nicotra, appears to be trying to salvage his reputation while destroying it. Filled with many allegations, some being sexual harassment, to which we haven’t even begun to cover, it leads us to ask, “why doesn’t he simply stop?” As with most things, this is a question to which we may never get an answer. In the meantime, the people he has targeted have waged an all-out virtual war against this apparent abuser.
Youtube is a place of many cultures, religions, and video types. With millions of people uploading and livestreaming, contraversy is an absolute. A video circulating around on Twitter has created a contraversy of its own. The video, which was captured from the Youtube channel, “Amy’s life journey,” appears to show what many are coining as child abuse and neglect. The video clip is below.
Shortly after this clip begins, a child is heard crying. Through other videos, we were able to confirm the child to be approx two years in age. Rather than attending the child, Amy continues the video, completely ignoring the cries. However, this quickly changes when the child abruptly screams. Amy is seen putting her phone down, a smack is heard, and we hear her yelling at the toddler.
Upon further investigation, we found several occurances to which could be classified as questionable. In multiple videos, Amy is seen making a video while driving, a situation from which has already taken the lives of multiple people. However, in these instances, children are in the vehicle with her. Photos can be seen below.
While the first video,we have shown, is what has people outraged, the photos show a disturbing pattern. By filming these videos, when she should be focused on driving, Amy has willfully placed her children in immediate danger. It’s common knowledge that distracted driving has cost lives in the past. In fact, you can find livestreams to which the streamers have died in accidents. While people are outraged by the initial video shown, they should be further outraged by the habitual pattern of neglect and endangerment to her children.
We have reached out to Amy for comment. As of this time, we have gotten no reply. Should this change, however, we will update this article.
Last month, we did a couple of articles in regards of a former correctional officer turned whistleblower. This article is an update on their situation. We like to think that doing the right thing means being rewarded, this is not the case.
As you maybe aware, the whistleblower’s former department caught onto who they were. Once this happened, they were issued a cease and disist via email. However, the Department of Corrections didn’t stop there. Through a recorded phone call, we were able to verify that the former officer resigned due to ongoing abuse and unethical treatment from their acting captain. The abuse extended to not only inmates, but to officers the captain did not like.
Recap of the resignation
The officer, who we only identify as “whistleblower,” resigned in December, 2019. Through bank records, we saw what they identified as “the final straw.” The department deposited their paycheck into their account in late November. However, early December the same department somehow withdrew their entire paycheck out of the account. As of this time, the bank has refused to comment in regards to how this happened.
Further documentation has revealed that the department intended to place the officer on what they called “secondary” payroll, a move often done as a form of punishment. However, this never happened. What transpired can only be described as sadistic. Once the pay was removed, the captain, as verified in audio recorded calls, placed the officer back on “primary” pay. By doing this, it negated the secondary payroll, thus making it where the officer got no pay until January. The targeting didn’t end there.
Since leaving the department, the former officer has been deamed completely unhirable. Living on only the money saved in their bank account, the noose of time has a constant effect on them. Allegedly, the department has fabricated the situation, claiming the individual was terminated for violating a policy, one that we have already shown to not exist. We, as a media platform, have been assisting the whistleblower, locating potential places of employment in their area. At this point, we have began assisting with their bills when able.
This entire series has opened a floodgate into what happens to those who refuse to conform. It demonstrates a warning to anybody who seeks to be in law enforcement: “join the blue brotherhood or pay the price.” Sadly, this individual’s convictions caused them to be against this uniformed, unspoken code. However, this isn’t an isolated event. In the past, we have seen similar articles to this. It also demonstrates the amount of power behind these agencies.
For the precious articles relating to this, check out the following links.
The above images were collected from a variety of tweets. While some images we took ourselves, WoC does not claim any credit for the vast majority. We felt having evidence in one location would be of a bigger benefit for all.
If you don’t know, journalist Chris Hansen arrived at the home of Gregory Jackson (Onision.) Rather than speaking to Hansen, Greg called the police. Below is the word-for-word transcript of the call.
Dispatcher: 911, what are you reporting?
Onision: Hi, uh, there’s a person that’s been stalking me online and they just showed up to my house. Yeah.
D: Okay. And they’re outside now?
O: Yes, they’re knocking on my door.
D: Okay. And do you know if they have any weapons?
O: They have a bunch of camera people. Like… they’re like YouTube stalkers.
D: … Okay. But no weapons seen?
O: I didn’t see any weapons. I just saw like six guys in my driveway.
O: And one of them is knocking on my door.
D: Okay, one second here…
[Typing and dog barking, indistinct chatter in the background]
D: And the one that’s knocking on the door… is he the main one that’s been stalking you?
O: Yes… yeah, he’s a stalker. He’s yelling things at me through the door, you know.
D: Okay and do we know his name at all?
O: It’s Chris Hansen.
D: Okay. H-A-N-S-E-N?
O: H-A-S-E-N [sic], yeah. H-A-N-S-E-N.
D: And then C-H-R-I-S?
O: C-H-R-I-S, yeah.
D: Okay. Is he white, black, caucasian, hispanic?
O: He’s white.
D: Okay. Do we know how old he is?
O: He’s an older… he’s like probably 58, 60.
D: Okay. How tall?
O: Uh… probably 5’10”, 5’11”.
D: Okay. Thin, medium, or heavy?
O: Uh… he’s skinnier.
D: What color is his hair?
O: Uh, blondeish gray.
D: Okay. And are you able to see what he’s wearing or no?
O: I think he’s wearing a black jacket.
O: Uh, I have a uh… security camera.
D: Uh huh. Can you see what color pants?
O: Um… [dog barking]. He’s wearing a black jacket, black pants. He’s still yelling things at me through the door.
D: Okay. Black jacket, black pants. Can you hear what he’s yelling?
O: Oh, he’s yelling I want your side of the story, Greg. My name’s not even Greg.
D: Okay. What is your last name?
O: My name is James Jackson.
D: Okay. Last of Jackson, first of James is what I heard. Is that correct?
O: Yeah… he’s saying I just want to talk through the door.
D: Okay. And what’s your date of birth?
O: November 11th, 1985.
D: November 11th, 1985?
D: Okay. And is [REDACTED] your best call back number?
D: Okay. Do you have any weapons in the home, James?
O: No, I don’t.
D: Okay. And you said that there was roughly five more people there with cameras?
O: Yes. In the driveway.
D: Okay. One second here.
[Typing and dog barking]
D: And do you know what he was talking about? Why he was stalking you or anything like that?
O: Yeah, there’s like a… it looks like there’s 1…2…3…4…5…6 people in the driveway. But he..he. I had someone that I uh… there’s an 18… no, I think a 19 year old who I didn’t want to hang out with. I didn’t want to be around them. They have BPD and their stuff…their mental disorder was really affecting my life in a negative way and I didn’t want them in my life anymore. And uh… they went to this person and said a bunch of mean things about me and so now this person is like, trying to aggressively pursue me in a really hateful way.
D: Okay, you said they were from YouTube. So is it like… a show that they do or…?
O: It’s a live stream. Yeah, it’s a… I’ve already talked to a lawyer about slander. This guy is just really, really hateful towards me.
D: Okay. And are you able to see what type of vehicle they arrived in?
O: No… they parked way down the street which is really sketchy. They’re standing out next to my SUV.
D: Okay. We’re working on getting units out there as quickly as we can. Do you feel comfortable disconnecting the line and then if anything changes calling us back?
O: Yeah. It… it should be fine. We’re just hiding away from the windows.
D: Okay. If anything changes before we arrive, please call us back okay?
O: Okay thank you.
D: Thank you. Buh-bye.
———————— EIGHT MINUTES LATER—————
D: 911, what are you reporting?
O: Hi, um, I’m calling back. I reported some people that showed up at my house. Um. They’re trespassing and they’re on my—
D: What’s the address there?
D: Okay I do show your call here, Sir. Has something changed on scene there?
O: Just waiting for the police to show up. They’re still on my driveway.
D: Okay. It is still showing here on my screen and law enforcement has been advised. If anything does change or escalate call us back, okay?
O: Are you guys going to show up?
D: Sir, it has been sent to the officers. They have to drive to you okay? If anything escalates call us back, okay?
O: Okay, thank you.
D: Okay, you’re welcome.
Introduced in Senate (05/18/2017)
This bill redesignates the Office of Children’s Issues of the Department of State as the Office of Vulnerable Children and Family Security (VCFS).
The President shall appoint an Ambassador-at-Large to promote: (1) oversight of the VCFS; (2) the implementation in foreign countries of child welfare laws and policies in keeping with the goals of the United States Government Action Plan on Children in Adversity; and (3) addressing the gap in U.S. diplomacy, policy, and operations regarding permanent family care for children living without families.
The Ambassador-at-Large shall: (1) advise the State Department and the President about vulnerable children and family security in foreign countries; (2) represent the United States regarding international child welfare, family preservation and reunification, and provision of permanent, safe parental care; (3) develop related policies and programs; and (4) submit an annual report on implementation of such action plan.
The bill provides the VCFS with lead responsibility for: (1) representing the U.S. government regarding intercountry adoptions, and (2) determining whether a country has met its obligations under the Hague Convention of Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Inter-Country Adoption and is eligible to participate in intercountry adoptions in accordance with U.S. law.
The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 is amended to: (1) include in the annual country reports on human rights practices information on the conditions of children living in orphanages and group homes, and (2) repeal certain provisions providing assistance for orphans and other vulnerable children.
The Special Advisor for Assistance to Orphans and Vulnerable Children shall work with the Ambassador-at-Large to ensure that U.S. assistance and development programs are focused on:
child development through the integration of health, nutrition, and family support;
facilitating government efforts to protect children from violence, exploitation, and neglect;
building integrated child welfare and protection systems; and
integrating such objectives with U.S. government agencies.
CITATION OF SOURCE:
Previously, we had covered a few aspects of the department of Corrections and their operations. You may read that article here. Today, we are going to be expanding on this. Furthermore, as our insider has been discovered by their former department, giving an update to that situation. The intention of this article is to provide more inside information provided by an individual who would know best-a former officer. As before, their identity is being withheld to, at bear minimum, protect them from those who may wish to target them online.
We see it often in videos, the police brutally assaulting a person when it isn’t needed. However, we don’t see how officers often get away with this. According to our insider, a lot of it boils down to the wording on their reports. One example we were given is as follows: “when an officer utilizes use-of-force, rather justified or not, they are usually coursed on how the report should reflect that. For instance, if an officer body slams an inmate to the floor, a common occurance, their report will state that they ‘assisted’ the inmate to the floor. They do this because any report written maybe subject for court use; the officer can get into legal trouble if they state they body slammed the offender.” According to our insider, this is the big part of the foundation to getting out of legal responsibility for any injuries.
In cases where the force wasn’t warranted, the department has a tendancy to “doctor” reports, the classic cover-up. While this is publically denounced by D.O.C. it is a normal occurance. Furthermore, if an offender attempts to defend themselves from this, they are slapped with additional charges. These charges may include assaulting an officer, which leads to a longer prison sentence.
When the officer uses force, it is very common for jokes to be made, at the offender’s expense. These people take great pride, from what our insider saw, in laying the “smackdown” on those who may not be able to fight back. “Officers will generally make jokes such as ‘damn, talk about a rag doll effect, sucks to be them, and so on,” according to the insider. Officers, in many ways, are expected to have this mentality. Failing to do so usually results in being made a target by those who outrank you.
The “blue” brotherhood
“During my stint in working for D.O.C., I met a captain who was hardcore about the brotherhood. In the end, because I refused to act like the rest, I questioned him, I was made a target,” according to the source. Cadets who enter the department, with the “brotherhood” mentality, often find a high paying career. According to our source, if you aren’t one of these new officers, you are harassed and bullied into resignation, this also applies to seasoned officers.
While working there, our insider informed us of some of the harassment endured because of their former captain. Pay check being withheld for a month, constantly being in his office for various, and even petty reasons, and at the time they resigned, for violating a policy that did not exist within the department. As we are told, the above mentioned are only a few examples.
We asked the officer, aside the harassment, what was the final straw? What lead you to resign? Their answer is as follows: “the final straw, for me, was the captain getting the warden involved. I was supposed to go to a meeting, regarding violating a non-existant policy, a meeting that I knew meant my termination. The captain had already fucked me out of my pay, which meant, since we were paid monthly, I would go two months without a check. I simply had enough of their bullshit games, the amount of control over my life, and how they used threats to make us do what they wanted, even if we felt it unethical.”
We went on to inquire about the policy, we asked what policy did they violate, exactly? “Honestly, as stupid as this sounds, I drove myself to another facility, to which I was required to be at. I didn’t have the money to get to my home facility so taking a state car wasn’t an option,” was the very quick response given. As we could tell, it appeared that our insider actually violated the “blue brotherhood” code in several ways.
As we can tell, and as generalized law enforcement has revealed, this is a career of being a thug. Those who are thugs last. On the other hand, if you opt out of this mentality, you are bullied into resignation or even terminated. If there is no “justified” means, they fabricate one. Their job, according to the insider, is to ensure inmates don’t break out of the prison, do what they are told when they are told, and to ensure the institution operates smoothly.
A disturbing concept of prison comes in the form of the “segregated housing unit” (S.H.U.) the unit is essentially a jail within a prison. This unit is classified as a “maximum” security unit. What this means for inmates is: they are locked down 23hrs a day, aside from weekends. They get one hour on a secured yard, Monday-Friday only. If an inmate gets in trouble, they maybe sent to this unit pending investigation. The investigation can take upwards of 30 days to complete. However, this month is actually extended as weekends aren’t counted. This means that if an investigation takes the full thirty days, the inmate will actually be in this unit for approx. 45 days. It was further noted that our insider has, by first hand account, seen the mental deteriation of those locked down.
Synopsis of the information
From this, and our previous article, it is clear to see how this system is in shambles. A system that treats human beings worst than animals needs a complete overhaul. Worst yet, we are only about halfway through our notes. Should there be enough interest, we will happily do article III on this.
Officers laughing and joking about injuring people is appauling. Officers targeting their own, simply for wanting to do their jobs, is just as bad. We often ask ourselves, “why aren’t there any good officers?” These articles are demonstrating the answer, as provided by, first hand experience.
Our insider has informed us that after releasing our previous article, there has been some rather suspicious activity around their house. Daily, in some cases several times a day, police cars have been witnessed slowing down in front of their home. In several instances, the cars have been observed coming to a complete stop, the officer watches the home for a few minutes, and proceeds to drive away. Furthermore, they have informed us that several “unmarked” cars have been seen doing this. We are told this is a common practice when officers, or former officers, begin whistle-blowing their department. This seems, if it is a common occurance, to be a form of fear tactic, in our opinion.
We came across a site glitch when first trying to upload this. We are hoping this has been repaired. The video is uploaded here to avoid a false DMCA claim from Gregory (Onision.)